File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

최윤석

Choi, YunSeok
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.startPage 133669 -
dc.citation.title JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION -
dc.citation.volume 374 -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Hyunjun -
dc.contributor.author Lim, Dongjun -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Boreum -
dc.contributor.author Gu, Jiwon -
dc.contributor.author Choi, Yunseok -
dc.contributor.author Lim, Hankwon -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-21T13:36:29Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-21T13:36:29Z -
dc.date.created 2022-10-04 -
dc.date.issued 2022-11 -
dc.description.abstract An electric vehicle is considered as one of the promising alternative transport due to its eco-friendly zero CO2 emissions. This trend causes a new environmental issue, Li-ion battery waste, and diverse plans for the used battery are suggested for preventing it. A stationary energy system connected to 1 MW photovoltaic was proposed as a repurposing strategy for the used battery. In addition, techno-economic analysis including itemized cost estimation, profitability analysis, and uncertainty analysis, was carried out to provide economic guidelines on what we need for the upcoming used battery era. Further, the optimized purchase cost for the used battery was figured out via a genetic algorithm. A levelized cost of electricity of 0.31 USD kWh-1 was obtained showing the PV cost as the most influential factor. The range of optimized purchase costs was 2,679-70,927, 3,786-100,234, and 5,747-152,162 USD according to 5, 10, and 20 years of the remaining lifetime of the used battery, respectively, and this cost varied depending on the target discounted payback period and subsidy. Finally, the repurposing of the used battery was still infeasible in terms of economic profit since 98.1%, 88.2%, and 75.2% were presented indicating a probability of negative purchase cost for the used battery. Our results show the needs of capital cost expenditure reduction via technological advancement to encourage the repurposing of the used battery. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, v.374, pp.133669 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133669 -
dc.identifier.issn 0959-6526 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-85137693726 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/59629 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000857304000002 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher ELSEVIER SCI LTD -
dc.title What is the optimized cost for a used battery?: Economic analysis in case of energy storage system as 2nd life of battery -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess FALSE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Green & Sustainable Science & Technology; Engineering, Environmental; Environmental Sciences -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Science & Technology - Other Topics; Engineering; Environmental Sciences & Ecology -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Li -ion battery -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Reuse -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Energy storage system -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Economic analysis -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Cash flow diagram -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Genetic algorithm -
dc.subject.keywordPlus SOLAR PV -
dc.subject.keywordPlus TECHNOECONOMIC ANALYSIS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus FEASIBILITY -
dc.subject.keywordPlus GENERATION -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.