File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

김병민

Kim, Byungmin
Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering Research Group
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 1564 -
dc.citation.number 3 -
dc.citation.startPage 1549 -
dc.citation.title BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA -
dc.citation.volume 112 -
dc.contributor.author Seo, Hwanwoo -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Jisong -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Byungmin -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-21T14:08:30Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-21T14:08:30Z -
dc.date.created 2022-06-24 -
dc.date.issued 2022-06 -
dc.description.abstract Ground-motion prediction models (GMPMs) have been developed to estimate seismic intensity considering earthquake magnitude, source-to-site distance, site condition, and so on. This study proposes GMPMs to predict 5% damped pseudospectral acceleration (PSA) for 27 periods ranging from 0.01 to 10 s in Korea, based on three machine-learning techniques (i.e., artificial neural network [ANN], random forest [RF], and gradient boosting [GB]). We use 1189 ground motions recorded at 50 surface stations during the 77 earthquakes with a local magnitude (M-L) greater than 3.0, including the Gyeongju and Pohang earthquakes with M-L of 5.8 and 5.4, respectively. We compare the performances of the three machine-learning-based models and the classical regression-based model in terms of the coefficient of determination (R-2), root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), standard deviation of residuals, and between-event and within-event residuals. The GB-based model shows the best performance. In addition, we analyze the working process of the GB-based model using variable importance and partial dependence (PD) plots. Among the five independent variables (M-L, epicentral distance [R-epi], average shear-wave velocity of the upper 30 m [V-s30], focal depth, and slope angle) used in this study, M-L and R-epi are the most influential variables and show strong correlations with PSAs. We apply the GB-based model to three recent earthquakes larger than M-L 3.0, and the model accurately predicts the PSAs at various stations. We also generate maps of estimated PSA (PSA(eSt)) ) values for the four periods (T = 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 3 s) for the scenario earthquake with an M-L of 5.0. We provide a method for training the GB-based model using the Python library, which can enhance the ground-motion prediction not only in Korea but also worldwide, and an executable version of the validated GB-based model. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, v.112, no.3, pp.1549 - 1564 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1785/0120210244 -
dc.identifier.issn 0037-1106 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-85131222222 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/59003 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000806339300004 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher SEISMOLOGICAL SOC AMER -
dc.title Machine-Learning-Based Surface Ground-Motion Prediction Models for South Korea with Low-to-Moderate Seismicity -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess FALSE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Geochemistry & Geophysics -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Geochemistry & Geophysics -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordPlus AVERAGE HORIZONTAL COMPONENT -
dc.subject.keywordPlus RANDOM FOREST -
dc.subject.keywordPlus PARAMETERS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus EQUATIONS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus PGA -
dc.subject.keywordPlus PERIODS -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.