File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.startPage 896713 -
dc.citation.title FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH -
dc.citation.volume 10 -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Jung Eun -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Sunmi -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Hee-Sung -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-21T14:08:07Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-21T14:08:07Z -
dc.date.created 2022-07-07 -
dc.date.issued 2022-06 -
dc.description.abstract Although the primary and secondary vaccination rates in Korea account for over 75% of the total population, confirmed cases of COVID-19 are dramatically increasing due to immune waning and the Omicron variant. Therefore, it is urgent to evaluate the effectiveness of booster vaccination strategies for living with COVID-19. In this work, we have developed an age-specific mathematical model with eight age groups and included age-specific comorbidities to evaluate the effectiveness of age-specific vaccination prioritization strategies to minimize morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, we have investigated the impacts of age-specific vaccination strategies for different vaccine supplies and non-pharmaceutical intervention levels during two periods: (1) when vaccine supply was insufficient and (2) after the emergence of the omicron variant. During the first period, the best option was to vaccinate the 30-49 year age group and the group with comorbidities to minimize morbidity and mortality, respectively. However, a booster vaccination should prioritize the 30-49 year age group to promote both minimal morbidity and mortality. Critical factors, such as vaccination speed, vaccine efficacy, and non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), should be considered for effective vaccination prioritization as well. Primary, secondary vaccinations, and a booster shot vaccinations require different age prioritization strategies under different vaccination rates, vaccine efficacies, and NPI levels. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, v.10, pp.896713 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.3389/fpubh.2022.896713 -
dc.identifier.issn 2296-2565 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/58887 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000812850100001 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher FRONTIERS MEDIA SA -
dc.title Booster Vaccination Strategies for "Living With COVID-19 -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess TRUE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Public, Environmental & Occupational Health -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Public, Environmental & Occupational Health -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass ssci -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor comorbid-group priority vaccination -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor non-pharmaceutical intervention -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor SARS-CoV-2 -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor COVID-19 -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor age-specific vaccination -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor booster shot strategies -
dc.subject.keywordPlus IMPACT -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.