Approximate Truth vs. Empirical Adequacy
Cited 0 times inCited 0 times in
- Approximate Truth vs. Empirical Adequacy
- Park, Seungbae
- Issue Date
- TILGHER-GENOVA S A S
- EPISTEMOLOGIA, v.37, no.1, pp.106 - 118
- Suppose that scientific realists believe that a successful theory is approximately true, and that constructive empiricists believe that it is empirically adequate. Whose belief is more likely to be false? The problem of underdetermination does not yield an answer to this question one way or the other, but the pessimistic induction does. The pessimistic induction, if correct, indicates that successful theories, both past and current, are empirically inadequate. It is arguable, however, that they are approximately true. Therefore, scientific realists overall take less epistemic risk than constructive empiricists.
- Appears in Collections:
- SLA_Journal Papers
- Files in This Item:
- There are no files associated with this item.
can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Show full item record
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.