Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 371 | - |
dc.citation.title | ENTROPY | - |
dc.citation.volume | 24 | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chatterjee, Sujoy | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lim, Sunghoon | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-12-21T14:36:35Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-12-21T14:36:35Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2022-04-06 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-03 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Crowdsourcing has become an important tool for gathering knowledge for urban planning problems. The questions posted to the crowd for urban planning problems are quite different from the traditional crowdsourcing models. Unlike the traditional crowdsourcing models, due to the constraints among the multiple components (e.g., multiple locations of facilities) in a single question and non-availability of the defined option sets, aggregating of multiple diverse opinions that satisfy the constraints as well as finding the ranking of the crowd workers becomes challenging. Moreover, owing to the presence of the conflicting nature of features, the traditional ranking methods such as the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) cannot always be feasible as the optimal solutions in terms of multiple objectives cannot occur simultaneously for the conflicting cases (e.g., benefit and cost criteria) for urban planning problems. Therefore, in this work, a multi-objective approach is proposed to produce better compromised solutions in terms of conflicting features from the general crowd. In addition, the solutions are employed to obtain a proper ideal solution for ranking the crowd. The experimental results are validated using two constrained crowd opinion datasets for real-world urban planning problems and compared with the state-of-the-art TOPSIS models. | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | ENTROPY, v.24, no.3, pp.371 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/e24030371 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1099-4300 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85126614011 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/57738 | - |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/24/3/371 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000776926800001 | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.publisher | MDPI | - |
dc.title | A TOPSIS-Inspired Ranking Method Using Constrained Crowd Opinions for Urban Planning | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | TRUE | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Physics, Multidisciplinary | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Physics | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | crowdsourcing | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | decision making | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | multi-attribute decision problems | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | urban planning | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | crowdsourcing | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | decision making | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | multi-attribute decision problem | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | surban planning | - |
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Tel : 052-217-1404 / Email : scholarworks@unist.ac.kr
Copyright (c) 2023 by UNIST LIBRARY. All rights reserved.
ScholarWorks@UNIST was established as an OAK Project for the National Library of Korea.