File Download

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

DingFeng

Ding, Feng
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.number 6 -
dc.citation.startPage 061102 -
dc.citation.title APL MATERIALS -
dc.citation.volume 9 -
dc.contributor.author Qian, Cheng -
dc.contributor.author McLean, Ben -
dc.contributor.author Hedman, Daniel -
dc.contributor.author Ding, Feng -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-21T15:41:17Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-21T15:41:17Z -
dc.date.created 2021-12-09 -
dc.date.issued 2021-06 -
dc.description.abstract Carbon materials and their unique properties have been extensively studied by molecular dynamics, thanks to the wide range of available carbon bond order potentials (CBOPs). Recently, with the increase in popularity of machine learning (ML), potentials such as Gaussian approximation potential (GAP), trained using ML, can accurately predict results for carbon. However, selecting the right potential is crucial as each performs differently for different carbon allotropes, and these differences can lead to inaccurate results. This work compares the widely used CBOPs and the GAP-20 ML potential with density functional theory results, including lattice constants, cohesive energies, defect formation energies, van der Waals interactions, thermal stabilities, and mechanical properties for different carbon allotropes. We find that GAP-20 can more accurately predict the structure, defect properties, and formation energies for a variety of crystalline phase carbon compared to CBOPs. Importantly, GAP-20 can simulate the thermal stability of C-60 and the fracture of carbon nanotubes and graphene accurately, where CBOPs struggle. However, similar to CBOPs, GAP-20 is unable to accurately account for van der Waals interactions. Despite this, we find that GAP-20 outperforms all CBOPs assessed here and is at present the most suitable potential for studying thermal and mechanical properties for pristine and defective carbon. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation APL MATERIALS, v.9, no.6, pp.061102 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1063/5.0052870 -
dc.identifier.issn 2166-532X -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-85107375534 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/55184 -
dc.identifier.url https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/5.0052870 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000721052300003 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher AIP Publishing -
dc.title A comprehensive assessment of empirical potentials for carbon materials -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess TRUE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Nanoscience & Nanotechnology; Materials Science, Multidisciplinary; Physics, Applied -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Science & Technology - Other Topics; Materials Science; Physics -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordPlus GROWTH -
dc.subject.keywordPlus STABILITY -
dc.subject.keywordPlus STRENGTH -
dc.subject.keywordPlus DEFECTS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus CHEMICAL-VAPOR-DEPOSITION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus CVD GRAPHENE -
dc.subject.keywordPlus HYDROCARBONS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus MONOLAYER -
dc.subject.keywordPlus CONSTANTS -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.