File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

임한권

Lim, Hankwon
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 9514 -
dc.citation.number 23 -
dc.citation.startPage 9502 -
dc.citation.title GREEN CHEMISTRY -
dc.citation.volume 23 -
dc.contributor.author Choe, Changgwon -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Boreum -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Ayeon -
dc.contributor.author Cheon, Seunghyun -
dc.contributor.author Lim, Hankwon -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-21T15:07:34Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-21T15:07:34Z -
dc.date.created 2021-12-09 -
dc.date.issued 2021-11 -
dc.description.abstract In this work, a comprehensive study of CO2 methanation by coupling process simulation, economic analysis, and life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted to find out the most practicable pathway for green methane production in terms of technical, economic, and environmental aspects. For this work, different renewable energy resources, such as hydropower, wind power, and solar power, and water electrolysis, like alkaline water electrolysis (AWE) and proton-exchange membrane water electrolysis (PWE), leading to 6 scenarios for H-2 production were considered. From the economic analysis in terms of itemized cost estimation, the levelized cost of methane (LCOM) for scenarios 1 to 6 was obtained as 0.108, 0.118, 0.144, 0.121, 0.132, and 0.159 $ kWh(-1), respectively. In addition, from LCA, the respective quantified environmental impacts (i.e., CO2 emission) were obtained as 0.347, 0.813, 2.33, 0.537, 0.842, and 2.52 kg CO2-eq kg H-2(-1) for scenarios 1 to 6, respectively. And then, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was carried out to decide on the most appropriate renewable energy and water electrolysis based on different criteria of renewable energy capacity with Technology readiness level (TRL) of water electrolysis, LCOM, and CO2 emission for technical, economic, and environmental criteria, respectively. From this work, H-2 production from AWE with wind power (i.e., scenario 2) was selected to be the best pathway for green methane production owing to the narrow priority range of 0.130-0.191. Furthermore, scenario 5 (i.e., PWE with wind power) was determined to be the second pathway with the same reason. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation GREEN CHEMISTRY, v.23, no.23, pp.9502 - 9514 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1039/d1gc02755g -
dc.identifier.issn 1463-9262 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-85120901087 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/55168 -
dc.identifier.url https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2021/GC/D1GC02755G -
dc.identifier.wosid 000717131800001 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY -
dc.title Comprehensive assessment of CO2 methanation: which H-2 production pathway is practicable for green methane production in terms of technical, economic, and environmental aspects? -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess FALSE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Chemistry, MultidisciplinaryGreen & Sustainable Science & Technology -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea ChemistryScience & Technology - Other Topics -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordPlus POWER-TO-GAS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus SYNTHETIC NATURAL-GAS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus WATER ELECTROLYSIS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus RENEWABLE ENERGY -
dc.subject.keywordPlus ELECTROCHEMICAL REDUCTION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus MEMBRANE REACTOR -
dc.subject.keywordPlus HYDROGEN -
dc.subject.keywordPlus MITIGATION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus RESOURCES -
dc.subject.keywordPlus STORAGE -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.