File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

최윤석

Choi, YunSeok
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.startPage 108048 -
dc.citation.title RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY -
dc.citation.volume 216 -
dc.contributor.author Nagulapati, Vijay Mohan -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Hyunjun -
dc.contributor.author Jung, DaWoon -
dc.contributor.author Brigljevic, Boris -
dc.contributor.author Choi, Yunseok -
dc.contributor.author Lim, Hankwon -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-21T15:06:36Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-21T15:06:36Z -
dc.date.created 2021-10-25 -
dc.date.issued 2021-12 -
dc.description.abstract Prognostics of batteries involve state estimation and remaining useful life (RUL) prediction. Various data-driven approaches are being studied to achieve accurate RUL predictions and SOH estimations to ensure safety and reliability of battery systems. The Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) is a statistical approach that accommodates the nonlinear nature and small sample size data to effectively predict the RUL of lithium-ion batteries. Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) have the ability to approximate nonlinear data and since battery degradation is a nonlinear process, neural networks-based models can provide accurate RUL predictions for lithium-ion batteries. In this paper, both the GPR model and ANN model approaches are implemented on the NASA PCoE battery datasets and the predictions are compared. The model training and validation is performed by splitting the data into various proportions (30:70%, 50:50%, and 70:30% for training: validation). Furthermore, the model's prediction accuracy is compared with respect to single vs multi-variable data and single battery data vs combined multiple battery data. The approach improves the prediction accuracy with the models exhibiting low RMSE values of 0.0181 and 0.0367 for GPR and ANN models, respectively, for B0018 and RMSE values of 0.1516 and 0.0810 for GPR and ANN models, respectively, for B0048. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, v.216, pp.108048 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.ress.2021.108048 -
dc.identifier.issn 0951-8320 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-85114995043 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/54605 -
dc.identifier.url https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832021005524?via%3Dihub -
dc.identifier.wosid 000702351700094 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher ELSEVIER SCI LTD -
dc.title Capacity estimation of batteries: Influence of training dataset size and diversity on data driven prognostic models -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess FALSE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Engineering, Industrial; Operations Research & Management Science -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Engineering; Operations Research & Management Science -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Remaining useful life -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Gaussian process regression -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Artificial neural networks -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Lithium-ion battery -
dc.subject.keywordPlus LITHIUM-ION BATTERY -
dc.subject.keywordPlus GAUSSIAN PROCESS REGRESSION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus STATE-OF-HEALTH -
dc.subject.keywordPlus PREDICTION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus LIFE -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.