File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

이지민

Lee, Jimin
Radiation & Medical Intelligence Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.number 19 -
dc.citation.startPage 195013 -
dc.citation.title PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY -
dc.citation.volume 63 -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Jaegi -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Jimin -
dc.contributor.author Ryu, Dongmin -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Hochan -
dc.contributor.author Ye, Sung-Joon -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-21T20:08:09Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-21T20:08:09Z -
dc.date.created 2021-03-04 -
dc.date.issued 2018-10 -
dc.description.abstract A Fano cavity test was performed for four general-purpose Monte Carlo codes, EGSnrc, PENELOPE, MCNP6 and Geant4 to evaluate the accuracy of their electron transport algorithms in magnetic fields. In the simulations, a plane-parallel ionization chamber was modelled as a circular gas disk sandwiched between two circular solid wall disks. It was assumed that an isotropic and uniform line source per unit mass along the central axis of the gas and solid emits mono-energetic electrons with energies 0.01, 0.1,1.0 and 3.0 MeV at different magnetic field strengths 0, 0.35,1.0,1.5 and 3.0 Tin the electron transport mode (no Bremsstrahlung). The relative difference between the calculated dose to the gas region and the initial total energy of emitted electrons per unit mass was defined as the accuracy of Monte Carlo codes. In all results, EGSnrc with the enhanced electric and magnetic field (EEMF) macros was not considerably sensitive to the step size parameters and showed accuracy less than 0.18% +/- 0.06% with a coverage factor k = 2. The other codes could not achieve competent accuracy with their default settings of step size parameters, compared to EGSnrc with the EEMF macros. With the step size parameters carefully selected, the accuracy of PENELOPE and MCNP6 was within 1.0% and 0.4%, respectively. However, Geant4 showed accuracy within 1.7% except in 3.0 T. EGSnrc with the EEMF macros achieved the best accuracy for the Fano test at the electron energies and the magnetic field strengths investigated in this study and thus, would be recommended to simulate dose responses of ionization chambers in the presence of magnetic fields. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, v.63, no.19, pp.195013 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1088/1361-6560/aadf29 -
dc.identifier.issn 0031-9155 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-85054076684 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/50108 -
dc.identifier.url https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1361-6560/aadf29 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000446205200001 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher IOP PUBLISHING LTD -
dc.title Fano cavity test for electron Monte Carlo transport algorithms in magnetic fields: comparison between EGSnrc, PENELOPE, MCNP6 and Geant4 -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess FALSE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Engineering, Biomedical; Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Engineering; Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Fano cavity test -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor magnetic fields -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor ionization chambers -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Monte Carlo codes -
dc.subject.keywordPlus CHAMBER RESPONSE SIMULATIONS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus REFERENCE DOSIMETRY -
dc.subject.keywordPlus CROSS-SECTIONS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus PHOTON -
dc.subject.keywordPlus CODES -
dc.subject.keywordPlus RADIOTHERAPY -
dc.subject.keywordPlus ACCURACY -
dc.subject.keywordPlus MODELS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus SYSTEM -
dc.subject.keywordPlus WATER -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.