File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.number 23 -
dc.citation.startPage 6839 -
dc.citation.title SENSORS -
dc.citation.volume 20 -
dc.contributor.author Namgung, Kichang -
dc.contributor.author Yoon, Hyunsik -
dc.contributor.author Baek, Sujeong -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Duck Young -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-21T16:37:44Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-21T16:37:44Z -
dc.date.created 2021-02-23 -
dc.date.issued 2020-12 -
dc.description.abstract State prediction is not straightforward, particularly for complex systems that cannot provide sufficient amounts of training data. In particular, it is usually difficult to analyze some signal patterns for state prediction if they were observed in both normal and fault-states with a similar frequency or if they were rarely observed in any system state. In order to estimate the system status with imbalanced state data characterized insufficient fault occurrences, this paper proposes a state prediction method that employs discrete state vectors (DSVs) for pattern extraction and then applies a naive Bayes classifier and Brier scores to interpolate untrained pattern information by using the trained ones probabilistically. Each Brier score is transformed into a more intuitive one, termed state prediction power (SPP). The SPP values represent the reliability of the system state prediction. A state prediction power map, which visualizes the DSVs and corresponding SPP values, is provided a more intuitive way of state prediction analysis. A case study using a car engine fault simulator was conducted to generate artificial engine knocking. The proposed method was evaluated using holdout cross-validation, defining specificity and sensitivity as indicators to represent state prediction success rates for no-fault and fault states, respectively. The results show that specificity and sensitivity are very high (equal to 1) for high limit values of SPP, but drop off dramatically for lower limit values. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation SENSORS, v.20, no.23, pp.6839 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/s20236839 -
dc.identifier.issn 1424-8220 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-85096973456 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/50049 -
dc.identifier.url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/23/6839 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000597529600001 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher MDPI -
dc.title Estimating System State through Similarity Analysis of Signal Patterns -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess FALSE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Chemistry, Analytical; Engineering, Electrical & Electronic; Instruments & Instrumentation -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Chemistry; Engineering; Instruments & Instrumentation -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor fault detection -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor state prediction -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor pattern extraction -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor similarity analysis -
dc.subject.keywordPlus FAULT-DIAGNOSIS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus RECOGNITION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus PCA -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.