There are no files associated with this item.
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.citation.endPage | 496 | - |
dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 479 | - |
dc.citation.title | Dialogue | - |
dc.citation.volume | 59 | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, Seungbae | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-12-21T17:06:46Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-12-21T17:06:46Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2020-11-24 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-09 | - |
dc.description.abstract | A formulational debate is a debate over whether certain definitions of scientific realism and antirealism are useful or useless. By contrast, an epistemological debate is a debate over whether we have sufficient evidence for scientific realism and antirealism defined in a certain manner. I argue that Hilary Putnam’s definitions of scientific realism and antirealism are more useful than Bas van Fraassen’s definitions of scientific realism and constructive empiricism because Putnam’s definitions can generate both formulational and epistemological debates, whereas van Fraassen’s can generate only formulational debates. | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Dialogue, v.59, no.3, pp.479 - 496 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/S0012217320000062 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0012-2173 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85096947733 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/48802 | - |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/dialogue-canadian-philosophical-review-revue-canadienne-de-philosophie/article/formulational-vs-epistemological-debates-concerning-scientific-realism/63BC6C1F49844A68AD5DED67D86AF6F2 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000591872900008 | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.publisher | Cambridge University Press | - |
dc.title | Formulational vs. Epistemological Debates Concerning Scientific Realism | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | FALSE | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Philosophy | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Philosophy | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | ahci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | CEO turnover | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | interim CEO succession | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | interim CEO origin | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | disruption | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | turnaround | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | stock market reaction | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | firm performance | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | FIRM PERFORMANCE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TURNOVER | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MANAGEMENT | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DIRECTORS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PROMOTION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PAY | - |
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Tel : 052-217-1404 / Email : scholarworks@unist.ac.kr
Copyright (c) 2023 by UNIST LIBRARY. All rights reserved.
ScholarWorks@UNIST was established as an OAK Project for the National Library of Korea.