File Download

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

임정호

Im, Jungho
Intelligent Remote sensing and geospatial Information Science Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Forest and Crop Leaf Area Index Estimation Using Remote Sensing: Research Trends and Future Directions

Author(s)
Xu, JinQuackenbush, Lindi J.Volk, Timothy A.Im, Jungho
Issued Date
2020-09
DOI
10.3390/rs12182934
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/48778
Fulltext
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/18/2934
Citation
REMOTE SENSING, v.12, no.18, pp.2934
Abstract
Leaf area index (LAI) is an important vegetation leaf structure parameter in forest and agricultural ecosystems. Remote sensing techniques can provide an effective alternative to field-based observation of LAI. Differences in canopy structure result in different sensor types (active or passive), platforms (terrestrial, airborne, or satellite), and models being appropriate for the LAI estimation of forest and agricultural systems. This study reviews the application of remote sensing-based approaches across different system configurations (passive, active, and multisource sensors on different collection platforms) that are used to estimate forest and crop LAI and explores uncertainty analysis in LAI estimation. A comparison of the difference in LAI estimation for forest and agricultural applications given the different structure of these ecosystems is presented, particularly as this relates to spatial scale. The ease of use of empirical models supports these as the preferred choice for forest and crop LAI estimation. However, performance variation among different empirical models for forest and crop LAI estimation limits the broad application of specific models. The development of models that facilitate the strategic incorporation of local physiology and biochemistry parameters for specific forests and crop growth stages from various temperature zones could improve the accuracy of LAI estimation models and help develop models that can be applied more broadly. In terms of scale issues, both spectral and spatial scales impact the estimation of LAI. Exploration of the quantitative relationship between scales of data from different sensors could help forest and crop managers more appropriately and effectively apply different data sources. Uncertainty coming from various sources results in reduced accuracy in estimating LAI. While Bayesian approaches have proven effective to quantify LAI estimation uncertainty based on the uncertainty of model inputs, there is still a need to quantify uncertainty from remote sensing data source, ground measurements and related environmental factors to mitigate the impacts of model uncertainty and improve LAI estimation.
Publisher
MDPI
ISSN
2072-4292
Keyword (Author)
data sourceLAI estimationpassiveactivemodel inversionscale effectuncertainty
Keyword
NEURAL-NETWORKHYPERSPECTRAL VEGETATION INDEXESCANOPY STRUCTURERADIATIVE-TRANSFER MODELNET PRIMARY PRODUCTIONMODIS-LAI PRODUCTCHLOROPHYLL CONTENTREFLECTANCE MODELBIDIRECTIONAL REFLECTANCEBIOPHYSICAL VARIABLES

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.