File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

조재필

Cho, Jaephil
Nano Energy Storage Material Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 64 -
dc.citation.number 1-2 -
dc.citation.startPage 58 -
dc.citation.title JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES -
dc.citation.volume 146 -
dc.contributor.author Cho, Jaephil -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Tae-Gon -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Chunjoong -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Joon-Gon -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Young-Woon -
dc.contributor.author Park, Byungwoo -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-22T10:15:30Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-22T10:15:30Z -
dc.date.created 2014-05-22 -
dc.date.issued 2005-08 -
dc.description.abstract The electrochemical and thermal properties of AlPO4-coated LiCoO2 were compared with those of the Al2O 3-coated cathode. Even though cycling stability of the Al 2O3-coated cathode was apparently similar to that of the AlPO4-coated sample at 4.6 V cycling, increasing the charge-cutoff voltage to 4.8 V led to the rapid capacity decay, exhibiting ∼20% larger capacity-fading than the AlPO4-coated cathode. The irreversible capacity of the Al2O3-coated cathode (∼34 mAh g -1) was also larger than that of AlPO4-coated cathode (∼24 mAh g-1) at a charge-cutoff voltage of 4.8 V. This was attributed to the increase in the amount of Co dissolution into the electrolyte at higher voltage. Differential scanning calorimetry results showed that the overall exothermic-heat release of the Al2O3-coated cathode was similar to that of the bare cell, but the onset temperature of oxygen evolution from the cathode was increased to ∼190 °C (up from ∼170 °C in the bare cell). On the other hand, AlPO4-coated LiCoO2 showed a much improved onset temperature of the oxygen evolution at ∼230 °C, and a much lower amount of exothermic-heat release, compared to the Al2O3-coated sample. These results were correlated with the 12 V overcharge experiments: the Li-ion cell containing AlPO4-coated LiCoO2 did not show a thermal runaway behavior in contrast to that containing bare, or Al2O 3-coated cathode. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, v.146, no.1-2, pp.58 - 64 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.03.118 -
dc.identifier.issn 0378-7753 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-24944511541 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/4721 -
dc.identifier.url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=24944511541 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000232756700011 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV -
dc.title Comparison of Al2O3- and AlPO4-coated LiCoO2 cathode materials for a Li-ion cell -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor AlPO4 coating -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Al2O3 coating -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor LiCoO2 -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor cycling stability -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Co dissolution -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor overcharge -
dc.subject.keywordPlus COBALT DISSOLUTION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus BATTERIES -
dc.subject.keywordPlus STABILITY -
dc.subject.keywordPlus COMPONENTS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus AL2O3 -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.