There are no files associated with this item.
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.citation.conferencePlace | KO | - |
dc.citation.conferencePlace | BEXCO Convention Hall Busan | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 1794 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 1790 | - |
dc.citation.title | 15th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems, ICCAS 2015 | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, Jonghyeok | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yang, Taeyang | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Hakin | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Sung-Phil | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-12-19T21:41:26Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-12-19T21:41:26Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2016-05-24 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015-10-13 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This study aims to investigate EEG characteristics on a single-trial basis when people successfully or errantly predict the preference of others from the rapid evaluation of face images. Background: Empathic processes are associated with dorsal medial prefrontal cortex and right temporoparietal junction areas. Prediction of others' preference involves emphatic processes. So functional connectivity between prefrontal and right temporoparietal areas would be associated with the others' preference prediction ability. Methods: Twenty participants (female, average age: 21.86) participated in our others' preference prediction task using the rapid evaluation of face images. During this experiment, participants' electroencephalogram was measured. We analyzed spectral band power as well as phase relations between EEG channels. Results: The success and failure trials of the preference prediction task showed differences in phase resetting latency patterns of alpha oscillations between frontal and right posterior regions. To check whether these phase resetting patterns indicated the likelihood of success or failure trials, we changed participants' response whenever specific phase resetting patterns occurred. This resulted in1.41%pt increase in accuracy when we used an indicator from four pairs (FP2-T4, T4-P4, P4-FP2 and F4-T5) or 16.52%pt decrease in accuracy when we used it from two pairs (Fz-O2 and C3-T6). Conclusion: EEG phase resetting latencies between frontal and right parietal areas could indicate the likelihood of success or failure in a given trial of the others' preference prediction task. | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 15th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems, ICCAS 2015, pp.1790 - 1794 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1109/ICCAS.2015.7364649 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84966335471 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/37373 | - |
dc.identifier.url | http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=7364649 | - |
dc.language | 영어 | - |
dc.publisher | 15th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems, ICCAS 2015 | - |
dc.title | EEG characteristics related to prediction of what others prefer | - |
dc.type | Conference Paper | - |
dc.date.conferenceDate | 2015-10-13 | - |
Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
Tel : 052-217-1404 / Email : scholarworks@unist.ac.kr
Copyright (c) 2023 by UNIST LIBRARY. All rights reserved.
ScholarWorks@UNIST was established as an OAK Project for the National Library of Korea.