File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

이덕중

Lee, Deokjung
Computational Reactor physics & Experiment Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.conferencePlace MX -
dc.citation.title PHYSOR 2018 -
dc.contributor.author Yum, Sungpil -
dc.contributor.author Shin, Ho Cheol -
dc.contributor.author Zhang, Peng -
dc.contributor.author Choe, Jiwon -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Deokjung -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-19T15:53:05Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-19T15:53:05Z -
dc.date.created 2019-01-08 -
dc.date.issued 2018-04-22 -
dc.description.abstract A monitoring of the status of Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs) is essential to support operators of NPPs to avoid the initial events which eventually lead to severe accidents. In order to monitor the axial power distribution of nuclear reactor, the reconstruction of axial power shape using in-core detector signals is important. Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH) algorithm is a robust neural network algorithm to determine the relationship between in-core detector signals and axial power distribution. In the previous investigations, GMDH algorithm was examined for replacing Fourier series expansion method adopted to reconstruct the axial power distribution by commercially available Core Operating Limit Supervisory System (COLSS), and it was confirmed that GMDH algorithm could produce higher accuracy than the Fourier series expansion method. In this paper, training data sets have been categorized depending on the axial power shapes, i.e., cosine, saddle, top-skewed, and bottom-skewed shapes. Each category of the axial shape can be pattern-recognized by examining the in-core detector signals. The results show that recognizing data sets in different categories of the axial shapes and then applying the GMDH produces 1.37% higher accuracy in average, and 2.84% at maximum. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation PHYSOR 2018 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/36552 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher Mexican Nuclear Society -
dc.title Accuracy Improvement of Axial Power Shape Reconstruction of GMDH Algorithm Applying Pattern Recognition Technique -
dc.type Conference Paper -
dc.date.conferenceDate 2018-04-22 -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.