File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

임정호

Im, Jungho
Intelligent Remote sensing and geospatial Information Science Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.conferencePlace IT -
dc.citation.conferencePlace Milan -
dc.citation.endPage 1987 -
dc.citation.startPage 1984 -
dc.citation.title IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IGARSS 2015 -
dc.contributor.author Im, Jungho -
dc.contributor.author Park, Sunyoung -
dc.contributor.author Park, Sumin -
dc.contributor.author Rhee, Jinyoung -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-19T22:08:16Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-19T22:08:16Z -
dc.date.created 2016-01-12 -
dc.date.issued 2015-07-28 -
dc.description.abstract Soil moisture is important to understand the interaction between the land and the atmosphere, and has an influence on hydrological and agricultural processes such as drought and crop yield. In-situ measurements at stations have been used to monitor soil moisture. However, data measured in the field are point-based and difficult to represent spatial distribution of soil moisture. Remote sensing techniques using microwave sensors provide spatially continuous soil moisture. The spatial resolution of remotely sensed soil moisture based on typical passive microwave sensors is coarse (e.g., tens of kilometers), which is inadequate for local or regional scale studies. In this study, AMSR2 soil moisture was downscaled to 1km using MODIS products that are closely related to soil moisture through statistical ordinary least squares (OLS) and random forest (RF) machine learning approaches. RF (r2=0.96, rmse=0.06) outperformed OLS (r2=0.47, rmse=0.16) in modeling soil moisture possibly because RF is much flexible through randomization and adopts an ensemble approach. Both approaches identified T·V (i.e., multiplication between land surface temperature and normalized difference vegetation index) and evapotranspiration. AMSR2 soil moisture produced from the VUA-NASA algorithm appeared overestimated at high elevation areas because the characteristics of ground data for validation and correction used in the algorithm were different from those in our study area. In future study, AMSR2 soil moisture based on the JAXA algorithm will be evaluated with additional input variables including land cover, elevation and precipitation. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IGARSS 2015, pp.1984 - 1987 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1109/IGARSS.2015.7326186 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-84962575878 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/35503 -
dc.identifier.url http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=7326186 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. -
dc.title AMSR2 Soil moisture downscaling using multisensor products through machine learning approach -
dc.type Conference Paper -
dc.date.conferenceDate 2015-07-26 -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.