File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.conferencePlace US -
dc.citation.conferencePlace Washington -
dc.citation.endPage 793 -
dc.citation.startPage 789 -
dc.citation.title Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2016 International Annual Meeting, HFES 2016 -
dc.contributor.author Park, Sungryul -
dc.contributor.author Yi, Jinhyeong -
dc.contributor.author Choi, Donghee -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Songil -
dc.contributor.author Kyung, Gyouhyung -
dc.contributor.author Choi, Byeonghwa -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Ja Eun -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Seungbae -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-19T20:09:01Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-19T20:09:01Z -
dc.date.created 2017-01-13 -
dc.date.issued 2016-09-22 -
dc.description.abstract With more curved display products in the market and more exposure to such products, it is necessary to examine the effects of display curvature and task duration from the ergonomics perspective. The current study examined the effects of these two factors on visual performance, visual fatigue, visual discomfort, and display satisfaction during proofreading tasks. We incorporated five display curvatures (600R, 1140R, 2000R, 4000R, and flat) and five task durations (0, 15, 30, 45, and 60 min). Each of 50 individuals completed a 1-hr proofreading task at one of five display curvature conditions. The horizontal viewing distance was fixed at 600mm. Proofreading performance (speed and error rate), subjective visual fatigue [on ECQ (Eye Complaint Questionnaire)], physiological visual fatigue [CFF (Critical Fusion Frequency), blink duration, and blink frequency], visual discomfort (on VAS), and display satisfaction (on VAS) were measured. The highest mean proofreading speed was at 600R. The mean proofreading speed and error rate increased by 15.5% and 22.3%, respectively, over the 1-h task. The mean ECQ score and visual discomfort increased by 188.6% and 107.2% during 45 and 60 min of the task, respectively. The mean CFF and display satisfaction decreased by 0.49Hz and 11.2% during 15 and 15-45 min of the task. A polynomial regression model for subjective visual fatigue was developed (adjusted R2 = 0.6). These findings can be used when determining ergonomic display curvatures and predicting visual fatigue. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2016 International Annual Meeting, HFES 2016, pp.789 - 793 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1177/1541931213601181 -
dc.identifier.issn 1071-1813 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-85021796568 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/35379 -
dc.identifier.url https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1541931213601181 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2016 International Annual Meeting, HFES 2016 -
dc.title Effects of display curvature and task duration on proofreading task performance, visual fatigue, visual discomfort, and display satisfaction -
dc.type Conference Paper -
dc.date.conferenceDate 2016-09-19 -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.