File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

임한권

Lim, Hankwon
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.startPage 112839 -
dc.citation.title ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT -
dc.citation.volume 213 -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Hyunjun -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Ayeon -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Boreum -
dc.contributor.author Lim, Hankwon -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-21T17:36:37Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-21T17:36:37Z -
dc.date.created 2020-06-08 -
dc.date.issued 2020-06 -
dc.description.abstract Following the adoption of the Paris Agreement, H-2 has come to be considered a promising alternative energy carrier owing to its eco-friendly characteristics. However, H-2 is mostly obtained via carbon-based production methods, which account for approximately 96% of the global H-2 yield and emit CO2 as a by-product. A membrane reactor (MR) was introduced to produce H-2 more efficiently via a positive chemical equilibrium shift, according to Le Chatelier's principle. CaO was employed as a CO2 adsorbent in an MR to form a sorption-enhanced membrane reactor (SEMR), in which the additional CO2 removal enhanced the equilibrium shift. Additionally, the direction of sweep gas through the membrane with respect to that of the reactants, i.e., co-current or counter-current flow, was found to affect the performance of the reactors. In this study, numerical simulations based on chemical reaction kinetics were carried out to investigate the effects of the employment of H-2 separation membrane and/or CO2 adsorbent as well as those of co-current and counter-current flows. Based on the numerical simulation results, H-2 yield rates of 0.00143, 0.00145, 0.00127, 0.00121, and 0.00852 mol s(-1) were achieved using the SEMR with counter-current flow, SEMR with co-current flow, MR with counter-current flow, MR with co-current flow, and a packed-bed reactor, respectively. This showed that an SEMR can be used to not only enhance H-2 production but also achieve this in an environment-friendly manner. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, v.213, pp.112839 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112839 -
dc.identifier.issn 0196-8904 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-85083463914 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/32387 -
dc.identifier.url https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890420303770?via%3Dihub -
dc.identifier.wosid 000534066300019 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD -
dc.title Comparative numerical analysis for an efficient hydrogen production via a steam methane reforming with a packed-bed reactor, a membrane reactor, and a sorption-enhanced membrane reactor -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess FALSE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Thermodynamics; Energy & Fuels; Mechanics -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Thermodynamics; Energy & Fuels; Mechanics -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Numerical simulation -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor H-2 production method -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Membrane -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor CO2 capture -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Sorption-enhanced membrane reactor -
dc.subject.keywordPlus ALKALINE WATER ELECTROLYSIS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus ECONOMIC-EVALUATION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus CATALYST -
dc.subject.keywordPlus SEPARATION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus SORBENT -
dc.subject.keywordPlus GAS -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.