File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

박승배

Park, Seungbae
Philosophy of Science Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 154 -
dc.citation.number 10 -
dc.citation.startPage 146 -
dc.citation.title Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective -
dc.citation.volume 8 -
dc.contributor.author Park, Seungbae -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-21T18:38:38Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-21T18:38:38Z -
dc.date.created 2019-10-31 -
dc.date.issued 2019-10 -
dc.description.abstract Constructive empiricism implies that if van Fraassen does not believe that scientific theories and his positive philosophical theories, including his contextual theory of explanation, are empirically adequate, he cannot accept them, and hence he cannot use them for scientific and philosophical purposes. Moreover, his epistemic colleagues, who embrace epistemic reciprocalism, would not believe that his positive philosophical theories are empirically adequate. This epistemic disadvantage comes with practical disadvantages in a social world. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, v.8, no.10, pp.146 - 154 -
dc.identifier.issn 2471-956 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/30318 -
dc.identifier.url https://wp.me/p1Bfg0-4BY -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective -
dc.title Constructive Empiricism in a Social World: Reply to Richard Healey -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess FALSE -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass foreign -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.