File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

이덕중

Lee, Deokjung
Computational Reactor physics & Experiment Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 368 -
dc.citation.number 2 -
dc.citation.startPage 356 -
dc.citation.title NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY -
dc.citation.volume 51 -
dc.contributor.author Choe, Jiwon -
dc.contributor.author Choi, Sooyoung -
dc.contributor.author Zhang, Peng -
dc.contributor.author Park, Jinsu -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Wonkyeong -
dc.contributor.author Shin, Ho Cheol -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Hwan Soo -
dc.contributor.author Jung, Ji-Eun -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Deokjung -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-21T19:15:28Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-21T19:15:28Z -
dc.date.created 2019-03-22 -
dc.date.issued 2019-04 -
dc.description.abstract This paper presents the verification and validation (V&V) of the STREAM/RAST-K 2.0 code system for a pressurized water reactor (PWR) analysis. A lattice physics code STREAM and a nodal diffusion code RAST-K 2.0 have been developed by a computational reactor physics and experiment laboratory (CORE) of Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST) for an accurate two-step PWR analysis. The calculation modules of each code were already verified against various benchmark problems, whereas this paper focuses on the V&V of linked code system. Three PWR type reactor cores, OPR-1000, three-loop Westinghouse reactor core, and APR-1400, are selected as V&V target plants. This code system, for verification, is compared against the conventional code systems used for the calculations in nuclear design reports (NDRs) and validated against measured plant data. Compared parameters are as follows: critical boron concentration (CBC), axial shape index (ASI), assembly-wise power distribution, burnup distribution and peaking factors. STREAM/RAST-K 2.0 shows the RMS error of critical boron concentration within 20 ppm, and the RMS error of assembly power within 1.34% for all the cycles of all reactors. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, v.51, no.2, pp.356 - 368 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.net.2018.10.004 -
dc.identifier.issn 1738-5733 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-85062722176 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/27483 -
dc.identifier.url https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573318303334?via%3Dihub -
dc.identifier.wosid 000460093300003 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher KOREAN NUCLEAR SOC -
dc.title Verification and validation of STREAM/RAST-K for PWR analysis -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess FALSE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Nuclear Science & Technology -
dc.identifier.kciid ART002438718 -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Nuclear Science & Technology -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass kci -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Verification and validation -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor PWR core -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Two-step approach -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor STREAM -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor RAST-K 2.0 -
dc.subject.keywordPlus APPROXIMATIONS -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.