File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

박상서

Park, Sang Seo
Environmental Radiation Monitoring Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 874 -
dc.citation.number 7 -
dc.citation.startPage 865 -
dc.citation.title ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES -
dc.citation.volume 33 -
dc.contributor.author Park, Sang Seo -
dc.contributor.author Jung, Yeonjin -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Yun Gon -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-21T23:36:48Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-21T23:36:48Z -
dc.date.created 2019-08-30 -
dc.date.issued 2016-07 -
dc.description.abstract Radiative transfer model simulations were used to investigate the erythemal ultraviolet (EUV) correction factors by separating the UV-A and UV-B spectral ranges. The correction factor was defined as the ratio of EUV caused by changing the amounts and characteristics of the extinction and scattering materials. The EUV correction factors (CFEUV) for UV-A [CFEUV(A)] and UV-B [CFEUV(B)] were affected by changes in the total ozone, optical depths of aerosol and cloud, and the solar zenith angle. The differences between CFEUV(A) and CFEUV(B) were also estimated as a function of solar zenith angle, the optical depths of aerosol and cloud, and total ozone. The differences between CFEUV(A) and CFEUV(B) ranged from -5.0% to 25.0% for aerosols, and from -9.5% to 2.0% for clouds in all simulations for different solar zenith angles and optical depths of aerosol and cloud. The rate of decline of CFEUV per unit optical depth between UV-A and UV-B differed by up to 20% for the same aerosol and cloud conditions. For total ozone, the variation in CFEUV(A) was negligible compared with that in CFEUV(B) because of the effective spectral range of the ozone absorption band. In addition, the sensitivity of the CFEUVs due to changes in surface conditions (i.e., surface albedo and surface altitude) was also estimated by using the model in this study. For changes in surface albedo, the sensitivity of the CFEUVs was 2.9%-4.1% per 0.1 albedo change, depending on the amount of aerosols or clouds. For changes in surface altitude, the sensitivity of CFEUV(B) was twice that of CFEUV(A), because the Rayleigh optical depth increased significantly at shorter wavelengths. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, v.33, no.7, pp.865 - 874 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s00376-016-5201-4 -
dc.identifier.issn 0256-1530 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-84969531711 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/27360 -
dc.identifier.url https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00376-016-5201-4 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000376408600007 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher SCIENCE PRESS -
dc.title Spectral dependence on the correction factor of erythemal UV for cloud, aerosol, total ozone, and surface properties: A modeling study -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess FALSE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Erythemal UV -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor correction factor -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor UV-A -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor UV-B -
dc.subject.keywordPlus LONG-TERM VARIATIONS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus ULTRAVIOLET-RADIATION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus B IRRADIANCE -
dc.subject.keywordPlus VARIABILITY -
dc.subject.keywordPlus ANTARCTICA -
dc.subject.keywordPlus TRENDS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus ALBEDO -
dc.subject.keywordPlus INDEX -
dc.subject.keywordPlus KOREA -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.