File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 733 -
dc.citation.number 6 -
dc.citation.startPage 723 -
dc.citation.title ERGONOMICS -
dc.citation.volume 62 -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Songil -
dc.contributor.author Kyung, Gyouhyung -
dc.contributor.author Choi, Donghee -
dc.contributor.author Yi, Jihhyeon -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Minjoong -
dc.contributor.author Choi, Byeonghwa -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Seungbae -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-21T19:14:42Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-21T19:14:42Z -
dc.date.created 2019-04-22 -
dc.date.issued 2019-04 -
dc.description.abstract Limited information is available regarding ergonomic foldable display device forms. This two-stage study involving young South Koreans (divided into three hand-length groups) was conducted to determine ergonomic forms for hand-held foldable display devices considering folding/unfolding comfort and preference. Stage I obtained the suitability of three screen sizes for five tasks. Stage II evaluated 14 different bi- and tri-folding methods considering screen size, folding direction, and folding time. The effects of hand length were all non-significant. Screen size preferences were task-dependent; small screens were preferred for making calls, and medium screens for web searching and gaming. Folding methods affected folding/unfolding comfort and preference; outward screen and Z-shape screen folding were the most preferred bi- and tri-fold concepts, respectively. Screen protection and access appeared to be competing factors in the user preference determination process. Foldable screen size and folding method should be determined by considering tasks, folding/unfolding comfort, and user preferences. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation ERGONOMICS, v.62, no.6, pp.723 - 733 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/00140139.2019.1602287 -
dc.identifier.issn 0014-0139 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/26585 -
dc.identifier.url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00140139.2019.1602287 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000470496700001 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher Taylor & Francis -
dc.title Where to put the creases? Interactions between hand length, task, screen size, and folding method on the suitability of hand-held foldable display devices -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess FALSE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Engineering, Industrial; Ergonomics; Psychology, Applied; Psychology -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Engineering; Psychology -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass ssci -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor foldable display -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor folding method -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor screen size -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor bi-fold screen -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor tri-fold screen -
dc.subject.keywordPlus TABLET COMPUTER -
dc.subject.keywordPlus CHARACTER SIZE -
dc.subject.keywordPlus AGE -
dc.subject.keywordPlus SMARTPHONES -
dc.subject.keywordPlus USABILITY -
dc.subject.keywordPlus USERS -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.