File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

임한권

Lim, Hankwon
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 7692 -
dc.citation.number 15 -
dc.citation.startPage 7684 -
dc.citation.title INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY -
dc.citation.volume 43 -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Chang-Hyun -
dc.contributor.author Han, Jae-Yun -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Sehwa -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Boreum -
dc.contributor.author Lim, Hankwon -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Kwan-Young -
dc.contributor.author Ryi, Shin-Kun -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-21T20:49:05Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-21T20:49:05Z -
dc.date.created 2018-07-31 -
dc.date.issued 2018-04 -
dc.description.abstract With the aim of producing hydrogen at low cost and with a high conversion efficiency, steam methane reforming (SMR) was carried out under moderate operating conditions in a Pd-based composite membrane reactor packed with a commercial Ru/Al2O3 catalyst. A Pd-based composite membrane with a thickness of 4-5 mu m was prepared on a tubular stainless steel support (diameter of 12.7 mm, length of 450 mm) using electroless plating (ELP). The Pd-based composite membrane had a hydrogen permeance of 2.4 x 10(-3) mol m(-1) s(-1) Pa-0.5 and an H-2/N-2 selectivity of 618 at a temperature of 823 K and a pressure difference of 10.1 kPa. The SMR test was conducted at 823 K with a steam-to-carbon ratio of 3.0 and gas hourly space velocity of 1000 h(-1); increasing the pressure difference resulted in enhanced methane conversion, which reached 82% at a pressure difference of 912 kPa. To propose a guideline for membrane design, a process simulation was conducted for conversion enhancement as a function of pressure difference using Aspen HYSYS (R). A stability test for SMR was conducted for similar to 120 h; the methane conversion, hydrogen production rate, and gas composition were monitored. During the SMR test, the carbon monoxide concentration in the total reformed stream was <1%, indicating that a series of water gas shift reactors was not needed in our membrane reactor system. (C) 2017 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, v.43, no.15, pp.7684 - 7692 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.11.176 -
dc.identifier.issn 0360-3199 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-85038826263 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/24471 -
dc.identifier.url https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360319917346396?via%3Dihub -
dc.identifier.wosid 000430519600049 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD -
dc.title Hydrogen production by steam methane reforming in a membrane reactor equipped with a Pd composite membrane deposited on a porous stainless steel -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Steam methane reforming -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Membrane reactor -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Pd-based composite membrane -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Hydrogen -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Stability -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Process simulation -
dc.subject.keywordPlus EQUATION-OF-STATE -
dc.subject.keywordPlus WATER-GAS SHIFT -
dc.subject.keywordPlus NATURAL-GAS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus ASPEN HYSYS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus SIMULATION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus PERFORMANCE -
dc.subject.keywordPlus EQUILIBRIUM -
dc.subject.keywordPlus INTEGRATION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus ADSORPTION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus SEPARATION -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.