File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

박승배

Park, Seungbae
Philosophy of Science Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 300 -
dc.citation.number 3 -
dc.citation.startPage 289 -
dc.citation.title HUMAN AFFAIRS -
dc.citation.volume 27 -
dc.contributor.author Park, Seungbae -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-21T22:07:45Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-21T22:07:45Z -
dc.date.created 2017-08-02 -
dc.date.issued 2017-07 -
dc.description.abstract It is supererogatory to refrain from eating meat, just as it is supererogatory to refrain from driving cars, living in apartments, and wearing makeup, for the welfare of animals. If all animals are equal, and if nonhuman omnivores, such as bears and baboons, are justified in killing the members of other species, such as gazelles and buffaloes, for food, humans are also justified in killing the members of other species, such as cows, pigs, and chickens, for food. In addition, it is fair for humans to eat animals because humans are also eaten by animals. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation HUMAN AFFAIRS, v.27, no.3, pp.289 - 300 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1515/humaff-2017-0024 -
dc.identifier.issn 1210-3055 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-85027004312 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/22435 -
dc.identifier.url https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/humaff.2017.27.issue-3/humaff-2017-0024/humaff-2017-0024.xml?format=INT -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher Walter de Gruyter GmbH -
dc.title Moral vegetarianism vs. Moral omnivorism -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.