File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 536 -
dc.citation.startPage 526 -
dc.citation.title ENERGY POLICY -
dc.citation.volume 101 -
dc.contributor.author Gao. Ruxing -
dc.contributor.author Choi, Sungyeol -
dc.contributor.author Ko, Won Il -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Sungki -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-21T22:40:34Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-21T22:40:34Z -
dc.date.created 2017-01-26 -
dc.date.issued 2017-02 -
dc.description.abstract In today's profit-driven market, how best to pursue advanced nuclear fuel cycle technologies while maintaining the cost competitiveness of nuclear electricity is of crucial importance to determine the implementation of spent fuel reprocessing and recycling in China. In this study, a comprehensive techno-economic analysis is undertaken to evaluate the economic feasibility of ongoing national projects and the technical compatibility with China's future fuel cycle transition. We investigated the dynamic impacts of technical and economic uncertainties in the lifecycle of a nuclear system. The electricity generation costs associated with four potential fuel cycle transition scenarios were simulated by probabilistic and deterministic approaches and then compared in detail. The results showed that the total cost of a once-through system is lowest compared those of other advanced systems involving reprocessing and recycling. However, thanks to the consequential uncertainties caused by the further progress toward technology maturity, the economic potential of fuel recycling options was proven through a probabilistic uncertainty analysis. Furthermore, it is recommended that a compulsory executive of closed fuel cycle policy would pose some investment risk in the near term, though the execution of a series of R&D initiatives with a flexible roadmap would be valuable in the long run. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation ENERGY POLICY, v.101, pp.526 - 536 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.enpol.2016.10.021 -
dc.identifier.issn 0301-4215 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-85008154365 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/21218 -
dc.identifier.url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421516305663 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000392768800053 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher ELSEVIER SCI LTD -
dc.title Economic potential of fuel recycling options: A lifecycle cost analysis of future nuclear system transition in China -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess FALSE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Economics; Energy & Fuels; Environmental Sciences; Environmental Studies -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Business & Economics; Energy & Fuels; Environmental Sciences & Ecology -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass ssci -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Levelized cost -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Fuel cycle transition -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Probabilistic approach -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Spent nuclear fuel management -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.