dc.citation.endPage |
122 |
- |
dc.citation.number |
2 |
- |
dc.citation.startPage |
115 |
- |
dc.citation.title |
AXIOMATHES |
- |
dc.citation.volume |
26 |
- |
dc.contributor.author |
Park, Seungbae |
- |
dc.date.accessioned |
2023-12-21T23:40:42Z |
- |
dc.date.available |
2023-12-21T23:40:42Z |
- |
dc.date.created |
2016-05-11 |
- |
dc.date.issued |
2016-06 |
- |
dc.description.abstract |
Indispensablists argue that when our belief system conflicts with our experiences, we can negate a mathematical belief but we do not because if we do, we would have to make an excessive revision of our belief system. Thus, we retain a mathematical belief not because we have good evidence for it but because it is convenient to do so. I call this view ‘mathematical convenientism.’ I argue that mathematical convenientism commits the consequential fallacy and that it demolishes the Quine-Putnam indispensability argument and Baker’s enhanced indispensability argument. |
- |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation |
AXIOMATHES, v.26, no.2, pp.115 - 122 |
- |
dc.identifier.doi |
10.1007/s10516-015-9281-z |
- |
dc.identifier.issn |
1122-1151 |
- |
dc.identifier.scopusid |
2-s2.0-84941351984 |
- |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/19143 |
- |
dc.identifier.url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10516-015-9281-z?wt_mc=internal.event.1.SEM.ArticleAuthorAssignedToIssue |
- |
dc.identifier.wosid |
000388182200001 |
- |
dc.language |
영어 |
- |
dc.publisher |
SPRINGER |
- |
dc.title |
Against Mathematical Convenientism |
- |
dc.type |
Article |
- |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory |
Philosophy |
- |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea |
Philosophy |
- |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass |
ahci |
- |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass |
scopus |
- |