File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 1993 -
dc.citation.number 15 -
dc.citation.startPage 1981 -
dc.citation.title INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH -
dc.citation.volume 39 -
dc.contributor.author Gao, Ruxing -
dc.contributor.author Choi, Sungyeol -
dc.contributor.author Zhou, Yun -
dc.contributor.author Ko, Won Il -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-22T00:36:24Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-22T00:36:24Z -
dc.date.created 2015-10-19 -
dc.date.issued 2015-12 -
dc.description.abstract The rapid expansion of nuclear energy in China has intensified concerns regarding spent fuel management. However, the consequences of failure or delay in developing approaches to managing spent fuel in China have not yet been explicitly analyzed. Thus, a dynamic analysis of transitions in nuclear fuel cycles in China to 2050 was conducted. This multidisciplinary study compares the environmental, security, and economic consequences of choices among ongoing technology development options for spent fuel management. Four transition scenarios were identified: the direct disposal of PWR (Pressurized Water Reactor) spent fuel, the recycling of PWR spent fuel through PWR-MOX (Mixed Oxides), the PWR-MOX followed by fast reactors, and the recycling of PWR spent fuel using fast reactors. Direct disposal would have the lowest cost of electricity generation under the current market conditions, while the reprocessing and recycling of PWR spent fuel would benefit the Chinese nuclear power program by reducing the generation of high level waste (67-82%), saving natural U resources (9-17%), and reducing Pu management risk (24-58%). Moreover, a fast reactor system would provide better performance than one-time recycling through PWR-MOX. The latter also poses high risks in managing the build-up of separated Pu. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, v.39, no.15, pp.1981 - 1993 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1002/er.3424 -
dc.identifier.issn 0363-907X -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-84954400718 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/17607 -
dc.identifier.url http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/er.3424/abstract -
dc.identifier.wosid 000367663900002 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher WILEY-BLACKWELL -
dc.title Performance Modeling and Analysis of Spent Nuclear Fuel Recycling -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess FALSE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Energy & Fuels; Nuclear Science & Technology -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Energy & Fuels; Nuclear Science & Technology -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor spent nuclear fuel -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor nuclear fuel cycle -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor high level waste -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor economic analysis -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor security risk -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor fuel cycle transition -
dc.subject.keywordPlus WASTE -
dc.subject.keywordPlus CYCLE -
dc.subject.keywordPlus CHINA -
dc.subject.keywordPlus POWER -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.