File Download

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

이덕중

Lee, Deokjung
Computational Reactor physics & Experiment Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.startPage 180979 -
dc.citation.title SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF NUCLEAR INSTALLATIONS -
dc.citation.volume 2015 -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Wonkyeong -
dc.contributor.author Park, Jinsu -
dc.contributor.author Kozlowski, Tomasz -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Hyun Chul -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Deokjung -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-22T01:10:30Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-22T01:10:30Z -
dc.date.created 2015-09-02 -
dc.date.issued 2015-06 -
dc.description.abstract A high-leakage core has been known to be a challenging problem not only for a two-step homogenization approach but also for a direct heterogeneous approach. In this paper the DIMPLE S06 core, which is a small high-leakage core, has been analyzed by a direct heterogeneous modeling approach and by a two-step homogenization modeling approach, using contemporary code systems developed for reactor core analysis. The focus of this work is a comprehensive comparative analysis of the conventional approaches and codes with a small core design, DIMPLE S06 critical experiment. The calculation procedure for the two approaches is explicitly presented in this paper. Comprehensive comparative analysis is performed by neutronics parameters: multiplication factor and assembly power distribution. Comparison of two-group homogenized cross sections from each lattice physics codes shows that the generated transport cross section has significant difference according to the transport approximation to treat anisotropic scattering effect. The necessity of the ADF to correct the discontinuity at the assembly interfaces is clearly presented by the flux distributions and the result of two-step approach. Finally, the two approaches show consistent results for all codes, while the comparison with the reference generated by MCNP shows significant error except for another Monte Carlo code, SERPENT2 -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF NUCLEAR INSTALLATIONS, v.2015, pp.180979 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1155/2015/180979 -
dc.identifier.issn 1687-6075 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-84939188388 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/16565 -
dc.identifier.url http://www.hindawi.com/journals/stni/2015/180979/ -
dc.identifier.wosid 000359247000001 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher HINDAWI PUBLISHING CORPORATION -
dc.title Comparative Neutronics Analysis of DIMPLE S06 Criticality Benchmark with Contemporary Reactor Core Analysis Computer Code Systems -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess TRUE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Nuclear Science & Technology -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Nuclear Science & Technology -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.