File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

민승규

Min, Seung Kyu
Theoretical/Computational Chemistry Group for Excited State Phenomena
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Complete basis set limit of ab initio binding energies and geometrical parameters for various typical types of complexes

Author(s)
Min, Seung KyuLee, Eun CheolLee, Han MyoungKim, Dong YoungKim, DongwookKim, Kwang S.
Issued Date
2008-06
DOI
10.1002/jcc.20880
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/16368
Fulltext
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcc.20880/abstract
Citation
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, v.29, no.8, pp.1208 - 1221
Abstract
Using basis-set extrapolation schemes for a given data set, we evaluated the binding energies and geometries at the complete basis set (CBS) limit at the levels of the second order Moller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) and the coupled cluster theory with singles, doubles, and perturbative triples excitations [CCSD(T)]. The systems include the hydrogen bonding (water dimer), aromatic interaction (benzene dimer), pi-H interaction (benzene-water), cation-water, anion-water, pi-cation interaction (cation-benzene), and pi-anion interaction (anion-triazine). One extrapolation method is to exploit both BSSE-corrected and BSSE-uncorrected binding energies for the aug-cc-pVNZ (N = 2, 3, 4,...) basis set in consideration that both binding energies give the same CBS limit (CBSB). Another CBS limit (CBSC) is to use the commonly known extrapolation approach to exploit that the electron correlation energy is proportional to N-3. Since both methods are complementary, they are useful for estimating the errors and trend of the asymptotic values. There is no significant difference between both methods. Overall, the values of CBSC are found to be robust because of their consistency. However, for small N (in particular, for N = 2, 3), CBSNB is found to be slightly better for water-water interactions and cation-water and cation-benzene interactions, whereas CBSNC is found to be more reliable for bezene-water and anion-water interactions. We also note that the MP2 CBS limit value based on N = 2 and 3 combined with the difference between CCSD(T) and MP2 at N = 2 would be exploited to obtain a CCSD(T)/CBS value for aromatic-aromatic interactions and anion-pi interactions, but not for cationic complexes. (C) 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Publisher
WILEY-BLACKWELL
ISSN
0192-8651
Keyword (Author)
complete basis set limitab initio calculationshydrogen bondingaromatic interactionspi-H interactionscation-pi interactionsanion-pi interactionswater dimerbenzene dimer
Keyword
CATION-PI INTERACTIONSEDGE-TO-FACEINDUCED DISSOCIATION EXPERIMENTSTOTAL ATOMIZATION ENERGIESBENZENE DIMERWATER DIMERHYDROGEN-BONDSGAS-PHASEAROMATIC INTERACTIONSCORRELATED CALCULATIONS

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.