File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

박종화

Bhak, Jong
KOrean GenomIcs Center
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 1486 -
dc.citation.number 8 -
dc.citation.startPage 1479 -
dc.citation.title BIOINFORMATICS -
dc.citation.volume 21 -
dc.contributor.author Moon, Hyun S. -
dc.contributor.author Bhak, Jong Hwa -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Kwang H. -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Doheon -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-22T10:37:01Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-22T10:37:01Z -
dc.date.created 2015-07-31 -
dc.date.issued 2005-04 -
dc.description.abstract Motivation: The structural interaction of proteins and their domains in networks is one of the most basic molecular mechanisms for biological cells. Topological analysis of such networks can provide an understanding of and solutions for predicting properties of proteins and their evolution in terms of domains. A single paradigm for the analysis of interactions at different layers, such as domain and protein layers, is needed. Results: Applying a colored vertex graph model, we integrated two basic interaction layers under a unified model: (1) structural domains and (2) their protein/complex networks. We identified four basic and distinct elements in the model that explains protein interactions at the domain level. We searched for motifs in the networks to detect their topological characteristics using a pruning strategy and a hash table for rapid detection. We obtained the following results: first, compared with a random distribution, a substantial part of the protein interactions could be explained by domain-level structural interaction information. Second, there were distinct kinds of protein interaction patterns classified by specific and distinguishable numbers of domains. The intermolecular domain interaction was the most dominant protein interaction pattern. Third, despite the coverage of the protein interaction information differing among species, the similarity of their networks indicated shared architectures of protein interaction network in living organisms. Remarkably, there were only a few basic architectures in the model (> 10 for a 4-node network topology), and we propose that most biological combinations of domains into proteins and complexes can be explained by a small number of key topological motifs -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation BIOINFORMATICS, v.21, no.8, pp.1479 - 1486 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti240 -
dc.identifier.issn 1367-4803 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-17444391730 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/13204 -
dc.identifier.url http://bioinformatics.oxfordjournals.org/content/21/8/1479 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000228401800030 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher OXFORD UNIV PRESS -
dc.title.alternative Architecture of basic building blocks in protein and domain structural interaction networks -
dc.title Architecture of basic building blocks in protein and domain structural interaction networks -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordPlus DATABASE -
dc.subject.keywordPlus YEAST -
dc.subject.keywordPlus SEQUENCES -
dc.subject.keywordPlus VISUALIZATION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus COEVOLUTION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus MOTIFS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus SCOP -
dc.subject.keywordPlus MAP -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.