File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

김정섭

Kim, Jeongseob
Urban Planning and Analytics Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 394 -
dc.citation.number 2 -
dc.citation.startPage 374 -
dc.citation.title HOUSING POLICY DEBATE -
dc.citation.volume 25 -
dc.contributor.author Blanco, Andres G. -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Jeongseob -
dc.contributor.author Ray, Anne -
dc.contributor.author Stewart, Caleb -
dc.contributor.author Chung, Hyungchul -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-22T01:20:13Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-22T01:20:13Z -
dc.date.created 2015-07-07 -
dc.date.issued 2015-04 -
dc.description.abstract Each year, thousands of units are lost from the assisted rental housing inventory through deterioration and default, subsidy expiration, and market-rate conversion. While a good deal of research and data collection has focused on identifying at-risk developments, less is known about what happens to former assisted developments after they exit income and rent restrictions. This article uses a survey of former assisted properties in Florida to identify their postsubsidy trajectories—that is, as to whether developments continue as rental housing, are converted to condominiums, or leave the housing stock through vacancy and demolition; and for those that continue as rental housing, whether they continue to offer affordable rents. Using logistic regression models, the article examines the property, housing market, and neighborhood characteristics that determine these trajectories. The results show that smaller properties, those that have been out of subsidy programs longer, and those in stronger neighborhood housing markets are more likely to be converted to condominiums. Among developments that continue as rental housing, those that previously had more stringent rent restrictions, those in strong rental submarkets, and those with better transit access tend to become unaffordable compared with previous rent limits. © 2014, © 2014 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation HOUSING POLICY DEBATE, v.25, no.2, pp.374 - 394 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/10511482.2014.941902 -
dc.identifier.issn 1051-1482 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-84926350860 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/12781 -
dc.identifier.url http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10511482.2014.941902?journalCode=rhpd20#.VbXHINLtlBc -
dc.identifier.wosid 000352320400009 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS -
dc.title Affordability After Subsidies: Understanding the Trajectories of Former Assisted Housing in Florida -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess FALSE -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass ssci -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.