File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

조재원

Cho, Jaeweon
Sense Laboratory
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 2526 -
dc.citation.number 11 -
dc.citation.startPage 2517 -
dc.citation.title WATER RESEARCH -
dc.citation.volume 33 -
dc.contributor.author Cho, Jaeweon -
dc.contributor.author Amy, G -
dc.contributor.author Pellegrino, J -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-22T12:10:46Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-22T12:10:46Z -
dc.date.created 2015-06-30 -
dc.date.issued 1999-08 -
dc.description.abstract Two source waters containing natural organic matter;(NOM) with different physical and chemical characteristics were crossflow-filtered using four types of membranes having different material and geometric properties. Transport measurements of NOM rejection and Aux decline were made. A resistances-in-series model was used to represent and quantitatively compare membrane flux decline and recovery. As anticipated, the resistance due to specific adsorption depended on the concentration at the membrane interface. For the two membranes showing evidence of NOM adsorption, reducing the initial flux (which we infer to also reduce the interfacial NOM concentration) also lowered the measured resistance assigned to adsorption in our protocol. Relative molecular mass (RMM) distribution measurements (by size exclusion chromatography) were used to calculate the average RMM of the NOM and persuasively illustrated that the nominal relative molecular mass cut-off(MWCO) of a membrane is not the unique predictor of rejection characteristics for NOM compounds. Size exclusion, electrostatic repulsion, and NOM aromaticity all influenced the NOM rejection. For a given wafer composition (including pH and ionic strength), membrane characteristics (such as the surface charge, hydrophobicity and nominal MWCO) can be combined with the NOM properties (such as total dissolved organic carbon, specific UV absorbance at 254 nm and humic content) to provide a consistent qualitative rationale for the transport results. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation WATER RESEARCH, v.33, no.11, pp.2517 - 2526 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00498-9 -
dc.identifier.issn 0043-1354 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-0033026507 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/11943 -
dc.identifier.url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135498004989 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000081183400006 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD -
dc.title Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: Initial comparison of rejection and flux decline characteristics with ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.