File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

조재원

Cho, Jaeweon
Sense Laboratory
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 2478 -
dc.citation.number 10 -
dc.citation.startPage 2461 -
dc.citation.title WATER RESEARCH -
dc.citation.volume 38 -
dc.contributor.author Sohn, Jinsik -
dc.contributor.author Amy, Gary -
dc.contributor.author Cho, Jaeweon -
dc.contributor.author Lee, Yonghun -
dc.contributor.author Yoon, Yeomin -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-22T11:06:23Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-22T11:06:23Z -
dc.date.created 2015-06-30 -
dc.date.issued 2004-05 -
dc.description.abstract Comprehensive disinfectant decay and disinfection by-product formation (D/DBP) models in chlorination and ozonation were developed to apply to various types of raw and treated waters. Comparison of several types of models, such as empirical power function models and empirical kinetic models, was provided in order to choose more robust and accurate models for the D/DBP simulations. An empirical power function model based on dissolved organic carbon and other parameters (Empirically based models for predicting chlorination and ozonation by-products: haloacetic acids, chloral hydrate, and bromate, EPA Report CX 819579, 1998) showed a strong correlation between measured and predicted trihalomethane (THM) and haloacetic acid (HAA) formation for raw waters. Internal evaluation of kinetic-based models showed good predictions for chlorine decay and THM/HAA formation, but no significant improvements were observed compared to the empirical power function model simulations. In addition, several empirical models for predicting ozone decay and bromate (ozonation disinfection by-product) formation were also evaluated and/or developed. Several attempts to develop kinetic-based and alternative models were made: (i) a two-stage model (two separate decay models) was adapted to ozone decay and (ii) an ozone demand model was developed for bromate formation. Generally, internal evaluation of kinetic-based models for ozone decay showed significant improvements, but no significant improvements for the simulation of bromate formation were observed compared to the empirical power function model simulations. Additional efforts were performed to reduce the gaps between specific models and their actual application. For instance, temperature effects and configuration of ozone contactors were considered in actual application. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation WATER RESEARCH, v.38, no.10, pp.2461 - 2478 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.watres.2004.03.009 -
dc.identifier.issn 0043-1354 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-2542491246 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/11907 -
dc.identifier.url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135404001320 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000222001800001 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD -
dc.title Disinfectant decay and disinfection by-products formation model development: chlorination and ozonation by-products -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.