File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

조재원

Cho, Jaeweon
Sense Laboratory
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 3871 -
dc.citation.number 10 -
dc.citation.startPage 3864 -
dc.citation.title ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY -
dc.citation.volume 39 -
dc.contributor.author Shon, HK -
dc.contributor.author Vigneswaran, S -
dc.contributor.author Ben Aim, R -
dc.contributor.author Ngo, HH -
dc.contributor.author Kim, IS -
dc.contributor.author Cho, Jaeweon -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-22T10:36:41Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-22T10:36:41Z -
dc.date.created 2015-06-30 -
dc.date.issued 2005-05 -
dc.description.abstract Membrane fouling is a critical limitation on the application of membranes to wastewater reuse. This work aims to understand the fouling phenomenon which occurs in ultrafiltration (UF; 17500 molecular weight cutoff (MWCO)) and nanofiltration (NF; 250 MWCO) membranes, with and without pretreatment. For this purpose, the molecular weight (MW) distribution of the organics has been used as a parameter to characterize the influent, the permeate, and the foulant on the membrane surface. The variation of foulant concentration on the membrane due to pretreatment of the influent by flocculation and/or adsorption was investigated in detail. With the UF membrane, the peak of the MW distribution of organics in the permeate depended on the pretreatment; for example, the weight-averaged MW (M-w) of 675 without pretreatment shifted down to 314 with pretreatment. In the case of the NF membrane, the Mw of organics in the permeate was 478 (without pretreatment) and 310 (with flocculation followed by adsorption). The Mw of the organics in the foulant on the membrane surface was 513 (UF) and 192 (NF) without pretreatment and 351 (UF) and 183 (NF) after pretreatment with flocculation followed by adsorption, respectively. Without the pretreatment, the foulant concentration was higher on both membranes. The difference was more significant on the UF membrane than on the NF membrane. For both membranes, the flocculation-and-then-adsorption pretreatment proved very effective -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, v.39, no.10, pp.3864 - 3871 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1021/es040105s -
dc.identifier.issn 0013-936X -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-18944397532 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/11895 -
dc.identifier.url http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es040105s -
dc.identifier.wosid 000229193700065 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher AMER CHEMICAL SOC -
dc.title Influence of flocculation and adsorption as pretreatment on the fouling of ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes: Application with biologically treated sewage effluent -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordPlus NATURAL ORGANIC-MATTER -
dc.subject.keywordPlus REVERSE-OSMOSIS MEMBRANES -
dc.subject.keywordPlus WASTE-WATER TREATMENT -
dc.subject.keywordPlus HUMIC SUBSTANCES -
dc.subject.keywordPlus NF MEMBRANES -
dc.subject.keywordPlus COAGULATION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus MICROFILTRATION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus RECOVERY -
dc.subject.keywordPlus SALTS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus REUSE -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.