File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

조재원

Cho, Jaeweon
Sense Laboratory
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 219 -
dc.citation.number 1-2 -
dc.citation.startPage 209 -
dc.citation.title JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE -
dc.citation.volume 279 -
dc.contributor.author Kwon, B -
dc.contributor.author Cho, Jaeweon -
dc.contributor.author Park, N -
dc.contributor.author Pellegrino, J -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-22T09:43:38Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-22T09:43:38Z -
dc.date.created 2015-07-01 -
dc.date.issued 2006-08 -
dc.description.abstract Ultrafiltration (UF) membranes may be used as both a primary water treatment and/or as a pretreatment for reverse osmosis or nanofiltration during desalination. Important operational issues continue to revolve around the choices of materials., nominal molecular mass cutoff (MWCO), and filtration hydrodynamics. To study the former two points, we isolated a fraction of natural organic matter, which we refer to as organic nanocolloids, from a drinking water source using a dialysis membrane with a MWCO of 2000 g/mol. We measured the physico-chemical properties of these nanocolloids and four high-quality UF membranes and performed short-time filtration measurements. The organic nanocolloids had a relatively higher molecular mass compared to typical NOM and an effective diffusion coefficient of similar to 3.20 x 10(-6) cm(2)/s. Under the same filtration conditions, the organic nanocolloids were shown to have different transport and theoretical surface interaction characteristics through regenerated cellulose (RC) than through polyethersulfone (PES) membranes. These differences made minimal difference in the filtration figures-of-merit - these were the observed total organic carbon (TOC) rejection and solution flux decline - when the two materials were in membranes with MWCO smaller than the nanocolloids, but not when the membranes' MWCO was on the same order as that of the nanocolloids. The RC had greater flux but rejected significantly less TOC and experienced more percentage flux decline over time. even though it theoretically would have less favorable interaction potentials with the organic nanocolloids. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, v.279, no.1-2, pp.209 - 219 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.12.007 -
dc.identifier.issn 0376-7388 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-33744543967 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/11777 -
dc.identifier.url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376738805008677 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000238505900020 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV -
dc.title Organic nanocolloid fouling in UF membranes -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor dialysis -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor fouling -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor natural organic matter -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor organic nanocolloids -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor polyethersulfone -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor regenerated cellulose -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor ultrafiltration -
dc.subject.keywordPlus FLUX DECLINE -
dc.subject.keywordPlus HUMIC-ACID -
dc.subject.keywordPlus ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANES -
dc.subject.keywordPlus MATTER NOM -
dc.subject.keywordPlus NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES -
dc.subject.keywordPlus FILTRATION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus MICROFILTRATION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus DIFFUSION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus REJECTION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus RESPECT -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.