File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

조재원

Cho, Jaeweon
Sense Laboratory
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Comparison of physico-chemical pretreatment methods to seawater reverse osmosis: Detailed analyses of molecular weight distribution of organic matter in initial stage

Author(s)
Shon, H. K.Vigneswaran, S.Cho, Jaeweon
Issued Date
2008-07
DOI
10.1016/j.memsci.2008.03.063
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/11752
Fulltext
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376738808002688
Citation
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, v.320, no.1-2, pp.151 - 158
Abstract
In desalination, effective pretreatment is the key to reduce membrane fouling that occurs during the seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) process. However, it is difficult to compare the flux decline after different pretreatments using a small-scale reverse osmosis filtration unit. In this study, we successfully evaluated the effect of pretreatment on SWRO in terms of molecular weight distribution (MWD) of seawater organic matter (SWOM) after 20h of SWRO operation. Microfiltration (MF), ultrafiltration (UF), ferric chloride (FeCl(3)) flocculation and powdered activated carbon (PAC) adsorption, were used as pretreatment. The effluents and the retentates after each pretreatment and 20 h of SWRO operation were characterized in terms of MWD. Although the normalized flux of SWRO showed similar flux decline (J/J(0) = 0.17) with/without pretreatment, SWOM concentration in the retentates after different pretreatments was different in quantity and it increased linearly with time. The slope of the SWOM increase was 0.110, 0.096, 0.077 and 0.059 after MF, FeCl(3) flocculation, UF and PAC adsorption pretreatments, respectively. MW peaks for the seawater used in this study consisted of 1200 Da (biopolymers), 950 Da (fulvic acids), 650 Da (hydrolysates of humic substances), 250 Da (low MW acids) and 90 Da (low MW neutrals and amphiphilics). FeCl(3) flocculation preferentially removed 1200 Da (biopolymers), while PAC adsorption mostly removed 950 Da (fulvic acids). UF and NF removed only a marginal amount of relatively large organics, while RO removed the majority of organics. The intensity of 1200, 950, 650 and 250 Da MW in the RO retentates increased with the RO operation time. The organics of MW around 1200 Da (biopolymers) had a relatively low rate of increase with time compared with those of lower MW. This suggests that the SWOM of 1200 Da MW was preferentially retained on the membrane surface. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
ISSN
0376-7388
Keyword (Author)
adsorptionflocculationmicrofiltration molecular weight distributionpretreatmentseawater reverses osmosisultrafiltration
Keyword
DESALINATIONMEMBRANEWATERCONSTITUENTSEFFLUENT

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.