File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

채한기

Chae, Han Gi
Polymer nano-composites and Carbon Fiber Laboratory
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 10935 -
dc.citation.number 24 -
dc.citation.startPage 10925 -
dc.citation.title POLYMER -
dc.citation.volume 46 -
dc.contributor.author Chae, Han Gi -
dc.contributor.author Sreekumar, T.V. -
dc.contributor.author Uchida, Tetsuya -
dc.contributor.author Kumar, Satish -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-22T10:11:24Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-22T10:11:24Z -
dc.date.created 2014-11-17 -
dc.date.issued 2005-11 -
dc.description.abstract Polyacrylonitrile (PAN)/carbon nanotubes (CNTs) composite fibers were spun from solutions in dimethyl acetamide (DMAc), using single wall (SWNTs), double wall (DWNTs), multi wall (MWNTs) carbon nanotubes, and vapor grown carbon nanofibers (VGCNFs). In each case, CNT content was 5 wt% with respect to the polymer. Structure, morphology, and properties of the composite fibers have been characterized using X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, scanning and transmission electron microscopy, tensile tests, dynamic mechanical tests, as well as thermal shrinkage. While all nanotubes contributed to property improvements, maximum increase in modulus (75%) and reduction in thermal shrinkage (up to 50%) was observed in the SWNT containing composites, and the maximum improvement in tensile strength (70%), strain to failure (110%), and work of rupture (230%) was observed in the MWNTs containing composites. PAN orientation is higher in the composite fiber (orientation factor up to 0.62) than in the control PAN fiber (orientation factor 0.52), and the PAN crystallite size in the composite fiber is up to 35% larger than in the control PAN (3.7 nm), while the overall PAN crystallinity diminished slightly. Nanotube orientation in the composite fibers is significantly higher (0.98 for SWNTs, 0.88 for DWNTs, and 0.91 for MWNTs and VGCNFs) than the PAN orientation (0.52-0.62). Improvement in low strain properties (modulus and shrinkage) was attributed to PAN interaction with the nanotube, while the improvement in high strain properties (tensile strength, elongation to break, and work of rupture) at least in part is attributed to the nanotube length. Property improvements have been analyzed in terms of nanotube surface area and orientation. ⓒ 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation POLYMER, v.46, no.24, pp.10925 - 10935 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.polymer.2005.08.092 -
dc.identifier.issn 0032-3861 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-27444436575 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/10358 -
dc.identifier.url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=27444436575 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000233144700038 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher ELSEVIER SCI LTD -
dc.title A comparison of reinforcement efficiency of various types of carbon nanotubes in polyacrylonitrile fiber -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Carbon fiber -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Carbon nanotube -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Polyacrylonitrile -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.