File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

박희천

Park, Heechun
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.number 5 -
dc.citation.startPage 37 -
dc.citation.title ACM TRANSACTIONS ON DESIGN AUTOMATION OF ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS -
dc.citation.volume 26 -
dc.contributor.author Park , Heechun -
dc.contributor.author Ku, Bon Woong -
dc.contributor.author Chang, Kyungwook -
dc.contributor.author Shim, Da Eun -
dc.contributor.author Lim, Sung Kyu -
dc.date.accessioned 2024-03-13T15:35:09Z -
dc.date.available 2024-03-13T15:35:09Z -
dc.date.created 2024-03-13 -
dc.date.issued 2021-09 -
dc.description.abstract Studies have shown that monolithic 3D (M3D) ICs outperform the existing through-silicon-via (TSV) -based 3D ICs in terms of power, performance, and area (PPA) metrics, primarily due to the orders of magnitude denser vertical interconnections offered by the nano-scale monolithic inter-tier vias. In order to facilitate faster industry adoption of the M31) technologies, physical design tools and methodologies are essential. Recent academic efforts in developing an EDA algorithm for 3D ICs, mainly targeting placement using TSVs, are inadequate to provide commercial-quality GDS layouts. Lately, pseudo-3D approaches have been devised, which utilize commercial 2D IC EDA engines with tricks that help them operate as an efficient 3D IC CAD tool. In this article, we provide thorough discussions and fair comparisons (both qualitative and quantitative) of the state-of-the-art pseudo-3D design flows, with analysis of limitations in each design flow and solutions to improve their PPA metrics. Moreover, we suggest a hybrid pseudo-3D design flow that achieves both benefits. Our enhancements and the inter-mixed design flow, provide up to an additional 26% wirelength, 10% power consumption, and 23% of power-delay-product improvements. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation ACM TRANSACTIONS ON DESIGN AUTOMATION OF ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, v.26, no.5, pp.37 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1145/3453480 -
dc.identifier.issn 1084-4309 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-85122563030 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/81624 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000756201200005 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY -
dc.title Pseudo-3D Physical Design Flow for Monolithic 3D ICs: Comparisons and Enhancements -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess FALSE -
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory Computer Science, Hardware & Architecture; Computer Science, Software Engineering -
dc.relation.journalResearchArea Computer Science -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scie -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor Monolithic 3D IC -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor pseudo-3D approach -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor computer-aided design -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor 3D placement -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor timing closure -
dc.subject.keywordPlus ANALYTICAL PLACEMENT -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.