File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

장재성

Jang, Jaesung
Sensors & Aerosols Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 8 -
dc.citation.number 6 -
dc.citation.startPage 1 -
dc.citation.title MEASUREMENT SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY -
dc.citation.volume 19 -
dc.contributor.author Jang, Jaesung -
dc.contributor.author Akin, Demir -
dc.contributor.author Bashir, Rashid -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-22T08:39:46Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-22T08:39:46Z -
dc.date.created 2014-10-16 -
dc.date.issued 2008-06 -
dc.description.abstract Motivated by capture and detection of airborne biological agents in real time with a cantilever biosensor without introducing the agents into liquids, we present the effects of inlet/outlet configurations of a homemade particle collector on the electrostatic capture of airborne 100 nm diameter nanoparticles under swirling gas flows. This particle collector has three different inlet/outlet configurations: forward inlet/outlet (FO), backward inlet/outlet (BO) and straight inlet/outlet (SO) configurations. We also present the electrostatic capture of Vaccinia viruses using the same particle collector and compare these virus measurements with the nanoparticle cases. The most particles were collected in the FO configuration. The numbers of particles captured in the BO and SO configurations were close within their standard deviations. For all the three configurations tested, the number of particles captured in the center electrode C was much smaller than those captured in the other electrodes at a flow rate of 1.1 l min-1 and an applied potential of 2 kV. Using a commercial CFD code FLUENT, we also simulated the effects of the three inlet/outlet configurations on the particle capture in terms of particle trajectories, velocities and travel times. This simulation was in a good agreement with measurements that the FO configuration is the most favorable to particle capture among the tested configurations at a flow rate of 1.1 l min-1. The effects of particle diameters on the capture will also be discussed. This collector can be used for real-time monitoring of bioaerosols along with cantilever biosensors. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation MEASUREMENT SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, v.19, no.6, pp.1 - 8 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.1088/0957-0233/19/6/065204 -
dc.identifier.issn 0957-0233 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-46749126219 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/7309 -
dc.identifier.url http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=46749126219 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000256907700014 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher IOP PUBLISHING LTD -
dc.title Effects of inlet/outlet configurations on the electrostatic capture of airborne nanoparticles and viruses -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor airborne nanoparticles and Vaccinia viruses -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor electrostatic capture -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor cantilever biosensors -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor swirling flows -
dc.subject.keywordPlus MICROORGANISMS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus PRECIPITATION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus COLLECTION -
dc.subject.keywordPlus BIOSENSORS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus PARTICLES -
dc.subject.keywordPlus SENSORS -
dc.subject.keywordPlus SYSTEM -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.