File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

박승배

Park, Seungbae
Philosophy of Science Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Moral Subjectivism vs. Moral Objectivism

Author(s)
Park, Seungbae
Issued Date
2022-09
DOI
10.6001/fil-soc.v33i3.4775
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/59261
Fulltext
https://www.lmaleidykla.lt/ojs/index.php/filosofija-sociologija/article/view/4775
Citation
FILOSOFIJA-SOCIOLOGIJA, v.33, no.3, pp.269 - 276
Abstract
Moral subjectivism is not self-defeating, contrary to what moral objectivists claim. Ockham’s Razor favours moral subjectivism over moral objectivism. It is circular for moral objectivists to say that since we construct sound and cogent arguments out of moral statements, moral statements are true. Moral subjectivism acknowledges the role that arguments play in our moral lives, contrary to what moral objectivists contend. The way in which moral objectivists attempt to establish moral objectivism ironically supports moral subjectivism.
Publisher
Lithuanian Academy of Sciences Publishers
ISSN
0235-7186

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.