File Download

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

ZhangLu

Zhang, Lu
OB/HRM Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.startPage 588793 -
dc.citation.title FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY -
dc.citation.volume 12 -
dc.contributor.author Yu, Haibo -
dc.contributor.author Yan, Changli -
dc.contributor.author Zhang, Lu -
dc.contributor.author Dong, Zhenhua -
dc.contributor.author Cheng, Long -
dc.contributor.author Zheng, Xiaoming -
dc.contributor.author Zhao, Ziqian -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-21T15:39:40Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-21T15:39:40Z -
dc.date.created 2021-07-09 -
dc.date.issued 2021-07 -
dc.description.abstract This paper's purpose is to test the employability paradox by adopting a combined linear and non-linear approach based on the conservation of resource (COR) theory and the prospect theory and further to discuss it in two groups of employees with different seniority following the career timetable perspective. A total of 623 pairs of matched employee and manager surveys was collected from 27 Chinese enterprises in two waves. Hierarchical regression analysis was used to test the hypotheses. The results show no paradox that perceived employability promotes both an employee's turnover intention and performance. Specifically, perceived employability has a significant inverted U-shaped effect on turnover intention but no direct influence on job performance. Seniority is a moderator, showing the curvilinear relationship only exhibits for employees with shorter work seniority (<= 3 years), and a positive linear relationship between perceived employability and job performance only exists for employees with longer seniority (>3 years). This study emphasizes the value of employability for employers and proposes who is more suitable and what timetable should be followed for employability enhancement in practice. In addition, the study provides an enlightening finding of the inverted U-shaped relationship between perceived employability and turnover intention, applies the COR theory and the prospect theory to explain the non-linear relationship, validates the effect of too much of a good thing (TMGT), and negates the paradox from the perspective of the perceived general employability and career timetable. -
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, v.12, pp.588793 -
dc.identifier.doi 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.588793 -
dc.identifier.issn 1664-1078 -
dc.identifier.scopusid 2-s2.0-85112423260 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/53189 -
dc.identifier.wosid 000685257900001 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher Frontiers Media S.A. -
dc.title Does the Employability Paradox Exist or Not? An Inverted U-Shaped Model -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess TRUE -
dc.type.docType Article -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass ssci -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass scopus -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor employability paradox -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor perceived employability -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor turnover intention -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor job performance -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor work seniority -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor the conservation of resource theory -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor the prospect theory -
dc.subject.keywordAuthor too much of a good thing effect -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.