File Download

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

임정호

Im, Jungho
Intelligent Remote sensing and geospatial Information Science Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Estimation of ground-level PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations using boosting-based machine learning from satellite and numerical weather prediction data

Alternative Title
부스팅 기반 기계학습기법을 이용한 지상 미세먼지 농도 산출
Author(s)
Park, SeohuiKim, MiaeIm, Jungho
Issued Date
2021-04
DOI
10.7780/kjrs.2021.37.2.11
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/52960
Citation
Korean Journal of Remote Sensing, v.37, no.2, pp.321 - 335
Abstract
Particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5 with a diameter less than 10 and 2.5 µm, respectively) can be absorbed by the human body and adversely affect human health. Although most of the PM monitoring are based on ground-based observations, they are limited to point-based measurement sites, which leads to uncertainty in PM estimation for regions without observation sites. It is possible to overcome their spatial limitation by using satellite data. In this study, we developed machine learning-based retrieval algorithm for ground-level PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations using aerosol parameters from Geostationary Ocean Color Imager (GOCI) satellite and various meteorological parameters from a numerical weather prediction model during January to December of 2019. Gradient Boosted Regression Trees (GBRT) and Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) were used to estimate PM concentrations. The model performances were examined for two types of feature sets-all input parameters (Feature set 1) and a subset of input parameters without meteorological and land-cover parameters (Feature set 2). Both models showed higher accuracy (about 10 % higher in R2) by using the Feature set 1 than the Feature set 2. The GBRT model using Feature set 1 was chosen as the final model for further analysis (PM10: R2 = 0.82, nRMSE = 34.9 %, PM2.5: R2 = 0.75, nRMSE = 35.6 %). The spatial distribution of the seasonal and annual-averaged PM concentrations was similar with in-situ observations, except for the northeastern part of China with bright surface reflectance. Their spatial distribution and seasonal changes were well matched with in-situ measurements. © 2021 Korean Society of Remote Sensing. All rights reserved.
Publisher
대한원격탐사학회
ISSN
1225-6161
Keyword (Author)
Particulate MatterPM10PM2.5Machine learningAODGOCI

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.