File Download

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

박상서

Park, Sang Seo
Environmental Radiation Monitoring Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Evaluation of tropospheric ozone reanalyses with independent ozonesonde observations in East Asia

Author(s)
Park, SunminSon, Seok-WooJung, Myung-IlPark, JinkyungPark, Sang Seo
Issued Date
2020-08
DOI
10.1186/s40562-020-00161-9
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/48228
Fulltext
https://geoscienceletters.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s40562-020-00161-9
Citation
GEOSCIENCE LETTERS, v.7, no.1, pp.12
Abstract
The modern reanalysis datasets provide not only meteorological variables, but also atmospheric chemical compositions such as tropospheric ozone and aerosol concentration. However, the quality of chemical compositions has been rarely assessed especially over East Asia. To better understand the characteristics of reanalysis datasets on regional scale, the present study evaluates tropospheric ozone derived from seven reanalyses against five independent ozonesonde observations in East Asia. The reanalysis datasets are the ECMWF Reanalysis 5th (ERA5), Monitoring Atmospheric Composition and Climate reanalysis (MACCRA), Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service reanalysis (CAMSRA), as well as the NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis (CFSR), NASA Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications version 2 (MERRA2), Japanese 55-year Reanalysis (JRA-55), and updated Tropospheric Chemistry Reanalysis (TCR-2). It turns out that MACCRA, CAMSRA, and TCR-2, which incorporate chemical transport model, depict most reasonable spatio-temporal variability of tropospheric ozone in East Asia. The MACC exhibits a better quality with relatively small mean biases of 6.4 +/- 1.3% in tropospheric column ozone than biases of 7.8 +/- 2.7% and 7.8 +/- 2.8% for CAMSRA and TCR-2. The CAMSRA further shows a significant monthly correlation with the observation of up to 0.7 at 850 hPa. Among the seven reanalyses, MACC, CAMSRA, and TCR-2 are suitable for local tropospheric ozone study on seasonal to inter-annual time scales. However, none of the seven reanalysis datasets reproduce the observed trend of tropospheric ozone. This result suggests that even the latest datasets are inadequate for the long-term ozone change study.
Publisher
SPRINGER
ISSN
2196-4092
Keyword (Author)
Tropospheric ozoneOzonesondeReanalysis evaluation
Keyword
CARBON-MONOXIDESURFACE OZONEAIR-QUALITYPHOTOCHEMISTRY PARAMETERIZATIONCAMS INTERIMTRANSPORTMODELSPOLLUTIONCAMPAIGNURBAN

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.