File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

임한권

Lim, Hankwon
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Comparative numerical analysis for an efficient hydrogen production via a steam methane reforming with a packed-bed reactor, a membrane reactor, and a sorption-enhanced membrane reactor

Author(s)
Lee, HyunjunKim, AyeonLee, BoreumLim, Hankwon
Issued Date
2020-06
DOI
10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112839
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/32387
Fulltext
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890420303770?via%3Dihub
Citation
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, v.213, pp.112839
Abstract
Following the adoption of the Paris Agreement, H-2 has come to be considered a promising alternative energy carrier owing to its eco-friendly characteristics. However, H-2 is mostly obtained via carbon-based production methods, which account for approximately 96% of the global H-2 yield and emit CO2 as a by-product. A membrane reactor (MR) was introduced to produce H-2 more efficiently via a positive chemical equilibrium shift, according to Le Chatelier's principle. CaO was employed as a CO2 adsorbent in an MR to form a sorption-enhanced membrane reactor (SEMR), in which the additional CO2 removal enhanced the equilibrium shift. Additionally, the direction of sweep gas through the membrane with respect to that of the reactants, i.e., co-current or counter-current flow, was found to affect the performance of the reactors. In this study, numerical simulations based on chemical reaction kinetics were carried out to investigate the effects of the employment of H-2 separation membrane and/or CO2 adsorbent as well as those of co-current and counter-current flows. Based on the numerical simulation results, H-2 yield rates of 0.00143, 0.00145, 0.00127, 0.00121, and 0.00852 mol s(-1) were achieved using the SEMR with counter-current flow, SEMR with co-current flow, MR with counter-current flow, MR with co-current flow, and a packed-bed reactor, respectively. This showed that an SEMR can be used to not only enhance H-2 production but also achieve this in an environment-friendly manner.
Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
ISSN
0196-8904
Keyword (Author)
Numerical simulationH-2 production methodMembraneCO2 captureSorption-enhanced membrane reactor
Keyword
ALKALINE WATER ELECTROLYSISECONOMIC-EVALUATIONCATALYSTSEPARATIONSORBENTGAS

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.