File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

임정호

Im, Jungho
Intelligent Remote sensing and geospatial Information Science Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Forest biomass estimation from airborne LiDAR data using machine learning approaches

Author(s)
Gleason, Colin J.Im, Jungho
Issued Date
2012-10
DOI
10.1016/j.rse.2012.07.006
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/2972
Fulltext
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84864187384
Citation
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, v.125, pp.80 - 91
Abstract
During the past decade, procedures for forest biomass quantification from light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data have been improved at a rapid pace. The scope of these methods ranges from simple regression between LiDAR-derived height metrics and biomass to methods including automated tree crown delineation, stochastic simulation, and machine learning approaches. This study compared the effectiveness of four modeling techniques-linear mixed-effects (LME) regression, random forest (RF), support vector regression (SVR). and Cubist-for estimating biomass in moderately dense forest (40-60% canopy closure) at both tree and plot levels. Tree crowns were delineated to provide model estimates of individual tree biomass.and investigate the effects of delineation accuracy on biomass modeling. We used our previously developed method (COTH) to delineate tree crowns. Results indicate that biomass estimation accuracy improves when modeled at the plot level and that SVR produced the most accurate biomass model (671 kg RMSE per 380 m(2) plot when forest plots were modeled as a collection of trees). All models provided similar results when estimating biomass at the individual tree level (505, 506, 457, and 502 kg RMSE per tree). We assessed the effect of crown delineation accuracy on biomass estimation by repeating the modeling procedures with manually delineated crowns as inputs. Results indicated that manually delineated crowns did not always produce superior biomass models and that the relationship between crown delineation accuracy and biomass estimation accuracy is complex and needs to be further investigated.
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
ISSN
0034-4257
Keyword (Author)
Biomass estimationLidar remote sensingMachine learningRandom forestCubistSupport vector regressionLinear mixed effects regressionTree crown delineation
Keyword
SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINESSMALL-FOOTPRINT LIDARTREE-CROWN DELINEATIONVARIABLE WINDOW SIZELEAF-AREA INDEXGENETIC ALGORITHMINDIVIDUAL TREESMULTISPECTRAL DATAFUSION APPROACHACTIVE CONTOUR

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.