File Download

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

SelfJames Andrew

Self, James Andrew
Design Practice Research Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC Field Value Language
dc.citation.endPage 41 -
dc.citation.number 3 -
dc.citation.startPage 25 -
dc.citation.title 디자인학연구 -
dc.citation.volume 26 -
dc.contributor.author Kim, Eun Jin -
dc.contributor.author Self, James A. -
dc.date.accessioned 2023-12-22T03:39:48Z -
dc.date.available 2023-12-22T03:39:48Z -
dc.date.created 2014-03-10 -
dc.date.issued 2013-08 -
dc.description.abstract Background: Although previous research has contributed to the development of the concept of design innovation, a lack of understanding related to how people actually perceive design innovation still exists. This study aims to investigate perceptions of innovation, and how these perceptions may differ as a result of such factors as background and education.

Method: Eleven products were selected from among the winners of the 2012 Reddot design awards as examples of innovative product design. Twenty design students and twenty students from a non-design background assessed the innovativeness and desirability of each product using a 5-point Likert scale. Based on Rampino’s innovation framework (2011), innovativeness of Form, Technology, and Mode of Use were assessed together with holistic innovativeness.

Results: The design and non-design students showed significant differences in their perceptions of holistic innovativeness, F (1,38) = 4.372, p < .05. They also perceived Mode of Use differently, indicated by an interaction effect between their major and the types of product they assessed. The results of a correlation analysis between innovativeness and desirability showed that holistic innovativeness is positively related to desirability. In contrast, innovativeness of Technology has a relatively weak relationship to product desire.

Conclusion: A greater understanding of how design innovation is perceived provides useful insights which may then be utilized in the design and development of more desirable, innovative products. In this regard, the investigation provides a foundation for successive studies to link the conceptual principle of design innovation to real-world innovation as it is perceived and experienced by the user.
-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation 디자인학연구, v.26, no.3, pp.25 - 41 -
dc.identifier.issn 1226-8046 -
dc.identifier.uri https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/2848 -
dc.language 영어 -
dc.publisher 한국디자인학회 -
dc.title Perceptions of product innovativeness and desirability : the influence of an education in design -
dc.type Article -
dc.description.isOpenAccess TRUE -
dc.identifier.kciid ART001799876 -
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass kci -

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.