File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

박상서

Park, Sang Seo
Environmental Radiation Monitoring Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Spectral dependence on the correction factor of erythemal UV for cloud, aerosol, total ozone, and surface properties: A modeling study

Author(s)
Park, Sang SeoJung, YeonjinLee, Yun Gon
Issued Date
2016-07
DOI
10.1007/s00376-016-5201-4
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/27360
Fulltext
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00376-016-5201-4
Citation
ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, v.33, no.7, pp.865 - 874
Abstract
Radiative transfer model simulations were used to investigate the erythemal ultraviolet (EUV) correction factors by separating the UV-A and UV-B spectral ranges. The correction factor was defined as the ratio of EUV caused by changing the amounts and characteristics of the extinction and scattering materials. The EUV correction factors (CFEUV) for UV-A [CFEUV(A)] and UV-B [CFEUV(B)] were affected by changes in the total ozone, optical depths of aerosol and cloud, and the solar zenith angle. The differences between CFEUV(A) and CFEUV(B) were also estimated as a function of solar zenith angle, the optical depths of aerosol and cloud, and total ozone. The differences between CFEUV(A) and CFEUV(B) ranged from -5.0% to 25.0% for aerosols, and from -9.5% to 2.0% for clouds in all simulations for different solar zenith angles and optical depths of aerosol and cloud. The rate of decline of CFEUV per unit optical depth between UV-A and UV-B differed by up to 20% for the same aerosol and cloud conditions. For total ozone, the variation in CFEUV(A) was negligible compared with that in CFEUV(B) because of the effective spectral range of the ozone absorption band. In addition, the sensitivity of the CFEUVs due to changes in surface conditions (i.e., surface albedo and surface altitude) was also estimated by using the model in this study. For changes in surface albedo, the sensitivity of the CFEUVs was 2.9%-4.1% per 0.1 albedo change, depending on the amount of aerosols or clouds. For changes in surface altitude, the sensitivity of CFEUV(B) was twice that of CFEUV(A), because the Rayleigh optical depth increased significantly at shorter wavelengths.
Publisher
SCIENCE PRESS
ISSN
0256-1530
Keyword (Author)
Erythemal UVcorrection factorUV-AUV-B
Keyword
LONG-TERM VARIATIONSULTRAVIOLET-RADIATIONB IRRADIANCEVARIABILITYANTARCTICATRENDSALBEDOINDEXKOREA

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.