File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

조한희

Cho, Han-Hee
Optoelectronic Nanomaterials Engineering Lab.
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Photoinduced Charge Transfer in Donor-Acceptor (DA) Copolymer: Fullerene Bis-adduct Polymer Solar Cells

Author(s)
Kang, Tae EuiCho, Han-HeeCho, Chul-HeeKim, Ki-HyunKang, HyunbumLee, MyoungheeLee, SunaeKim, BongSooIm, ChanKim, Bumjoon J.
Issued Date
2013-02
DOI
10.1021/am302479u
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/24812
Fulltext
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/am302479u
Citation
ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES, v.5, no.3, pp.861 - 868
Abstract
Polymer solar cells (PSCs) consisting of fullerene bis-adduct and poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT) blends have shown higher efficiencies than P3HT:phenyl C-61-butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) devices, because of the high-lying lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) level of the fullerene bis-adducts. In contrast, the use of fullerene bis-adducts in donor-acceptor (DA) copolymer systems typically causes a decrease in the device's performance due to the decreased short-circuit current (J(SC)) and the fill factor (FF). However, the reason for such poor performance in DA copolymer:fullerene bis-adduct blends is not fully understood. In this work, bulk-heterojunction (BHJ)-type PSCs composed of three different electron donors with four different electron acceptors were chosen and compared. The three electron donors were (1) poly[(4,8-bis-(2-ethylhexyloxy)benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b']dithiophene)-2,6-diyl-alt-(5-octylthieno[3,4-c]pyrrole-4,6-dione)-1,3-diyl] (PBDTTPD), (2) poly[(4,8-bis-(2-ethylhexyloxy)benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b']dithiophene)-2,6-diyl-alt-(4-(2-ethylhexanoyl)-thieno[3,4-b]thiophene)-2,6-diyl] (PBDTTT-C), and (3) P3HT polymers. The four electron acceptors were (1) PCBM, (2) indene-C-60 monoadduct (ICMA), (3) indene-C-60 bis-adduct (ICBA), and (4) indene-C-60 tris-adduct (ICTA). To understand the difference in the performance of BHJ-type PSCs for the three different polymers in terms of the choice of fullerene acceptor, the structural, optical, and electrical properties of the blends were measured by the external quantum efficiency (EQE), photoluminescence, grazing incidence X-ray scattering, and transient absorption spectroscopy. We observed that while the molecular packing and optical properties cannot be the main reasons for the dramatic decrease in the PCE of the DA copolymers and ICBA, the value of the driving force for charge transfer (Delta G(CT)) is a key parameter for determining the change in J(SC) and device efficiency in the DA copolymer- and P3HT-based PSCs in terms of fullerene acceptor. The low EQE and Jsc in PBDTTPD and PBDTTT-C blended with ICBA and ICTA were attributed to an insufficient Delta G(CT) due to the higher LUMO levels of the fullerene multiadducts. Quantitative information on the efficiency of the charge transfer was obtained by comparing the polaron yield, lifetime, and exciton dissociation probability in the DA copolymer:fullerene acceptor films.
Publisher
AMER CHEMICAL SOC
ISSN
1944-8244
Keyword (Author)
photoinduced charge transferdriving force for charge transfer (Delta G(CT))donor-acceptor (DA) copolymerfullerene bis-adductpolymer solar cell
Keyword
OPEN-CIRCUIT VOLTAGETRANSFER STATEEFFICIENCYPERFORMANCEBLENDS

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.