File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  • Find it @ UNIST can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)
Related Researcher

조형준

Cho, Hyungjoon
Read More

Views & Downloads

Detailed Information

Cited time in webofscience Cited time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Gradient-echo and spin-echo blood oxygenation level-dependent functional MRI at ultrahigh fields of 9.4 and 15.2 Tesla

Author(s)
Han, SoHyunSon, Jeong PyoCho, HyungjoonPark, Jang-YeonKim, Seung-Gi
Issued Date
2019-02
DOI
10.1002/mrm.27457
URI
https://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/24731
Fulltext
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/mrm.27457
Citation
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, v.81, no.2, pp.1237 - 1246
Abstract
Purpose: Sensitivity and specificity of blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) functional MRI (fMRI) is sensitive to magnetic field strength and acquisition methods. We have investigated gradient-echo (GE)- and spin-echo (SE)-BOLD fMRI at ultrahigh fields of 9.4 and 15.2 Tesla (T).

Methods: BOLD fMRI experiments responding to forepaw stimulation were performed with 3 echo times (TE) at each echo type and B-0 in alpha-chloralose-anesthetized rats. The contralateral forelimb somatosensory region was selected for quantitative analyses.

Results: At 9.4 T and 15.2 T, average baseline T-2* (n = 9) was 26.6 and 17.1 msec, whereas baseline T-2 value (n = 9) was 35.7 and 24.5 msec, respectively. Averaged stimulation-induced Delta R-2* was -1.72 s(-1) at 9.4 T and -3.09 s(-1) at 15.2 T, whereas Delta R-2 was -1.19 s(-1) at 9.4 T and -1.97 s(-1) at 15.2 T. At the optimal TE of tissue T-2* or T-2, BOLD percent changes were slightly higher at 15.2 T than at 9.4 T (GE: 7.4% versus 6.4% and SE: 5.7% versus 5.4%). The Delta R-2(*) and Delta R-2 ratio of 15.2 T to 9.4 T was 1.8 and 1.66, respectively. The ratio of the macrovessel-containing superficial to microvessel-dominant parenchymal BOLD signal was 1.73 to 1.76 for GE-BOLD versus 1.13 to 1.19 for SE-BOLD, indicating that the SE-BOLD contrast is less sensitive to macrovessels than GE-BOLD.

Conclusion: SE-BOLD fMRI improves spatial specificity to microvessels compared to GE-BOLD at both fields. BOLD sensitivity is similar at the both fields and can be improved at ultrahigh fields for thermal-noise-dominant ultrahigh-resolution fMRI.
Publisher
WILEY-BLACKWELL
ISSN
0740-3194
Keyword (Author)
BOLDfMRIgradient-echospin-echoultrahigh field
Keyword
HUMAN BRAINPHYSIOLOGICAL NOISEALPHA-CHLORALOSESIGNAL CHANGESBOLD FMRI7 TCONTRASTVOLUMEACTIVATIONFLOW

qrcode

Items in Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.