BROWSE

Related Researcher

Author

Park, Seungbae
Division of General Studies
Research Interests
  • Philosophy of Science and Ethics

ITEM VIEW & DOWNLOAD

Understanding without Justification and Belief?

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPark, Seungbaeko
dc.date.available2018-05-17T10:48:17Z-
dc.date.created2018-05-12ko
dc.date.issued201712ko
dc.identifier.citationPrincipia: An International Journal of Epistemology, v.21, no.3, pp.379 - 389ko
dc.identifier.issn1414-4217ko
dc.identifier.urihttp://scholarworks.unist.ac.kr/handle/201301/24116-
dc.identifier.urihttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2017v21n3p379ko
dc.description.abstractDellsén (2016a) argues that understanding requires neither justification nor belief. I object that ridding understanding of justification and belief comes with the following costs. (i) No claim about the world can be inferred from what we understand. (ii) We run into either Moore’s paradox or certain disconcerting questions. (iii) Understanding does not represent the world. (iv) Understanding cannot take the central place in epistemology. (v) Understanding cannot be invoked to give an account of scientific progress. (vi) It is not clear how misunderstanding arises.ko
dc.languageENGko
dc.publisherFederal University of Santa Catarinako
dc.subjectAcceptance, Belief, Justification, Knowledge, Moore’s Paradox, Understandingko
dc.titleUnderstanding without Justification and Belief?ko
dc.typeARTICLEko
dc.identifier.pid1080null
dc.identifier.rimsid30296ko
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85047625494ko
dc.type.rimsAko
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1808-1711.2017v21n3p379ko
Appears in Collections:
DGS_Journal Papers
Files in This Item:
2018Understanding.pdfDownload

find_unist can give you direct access to the published full text of this article. (UNISTARs only)

Show simple item record

qr_code

  • mendeley

    citeulike

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

MENU